Accessibility/Universal Design

Symposium, "Children with special needs: the intersection of health care, education, & the law." Introduction by editor-in-chief Michael J. Pappas, foreward by Susan P. Levitaon; articles by Teresa Glennon, Donna H. Lehr, Jill Greene, Tersa K. LaMaster, John J. O'Brien, Leslie Seid Margolis, Gerard A. Gioia, Peter K. Isquith, Ellen A. Callegary, Ian Hill, Renee Schwalberg, Beth Zimmerman, Wilma Tilson and Henry Ireys; note by Lucy W. Shum, 5 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 1 (2002).

Symposium, Lead Articles: The Americans with Disabilities Act in Cyberspace: Applying the "Nexus" Approach to Private Internet Websites, 55 Mercer L. Rev. 963 (2004).

Peter Blanck, Ann Wilichowski, & James Schmeling, DISABILITY CIVIL RIGHTS LAW AND POLICY: ACCESSIBLE COURTROOM TECHNOLOGY, 12 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 825 (2004).

Erin M. Davis, Comment. A New York perspective reguarding access and usability for the disabled and elderly in private residential dwellings: what can be done on a local level to provide basic access and usability in private dwellings utilizing cost effective and efficient methods, 12 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 917 (2002).

Erin M. Davis, Comment. A new york perspective reguarding access and usability for the disabled and elderly in private residential dwellings: what can be done on a local level to provde basic access and usability in private dwellings utilizing cost effective and efficient methods., 12 Alb. L. J. Sci. & Tech. 917 (2002).

Michael D. Driver, Is the ADA Short-Sighted? An Analysis of Sightline Regulations in Movie Theaters, 8 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment Law and Technology Law Spring, 2006 399 (2006).

Felicia H. Ellsworth, The worst seats in the house: Staduim-style movie theatres and the Americans with Disabilities Act., 71 Chi. L. Rev. 1109 (2004).

Evgenia Fkiaras, LIABILITY UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT FOR PRIVATE WEB SITE OPERATORS, 2 Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce, & Technology Autumn, 2005 6 (2005).

Ellen Aubrey Fred, Note. Outdoor accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act: must holders of conservation easements provide ADA access?, 54 Hastings L.J. 243 (2002).

Michael Goldfarb, Comment: Access now, inc. v. southwest airlines, co. -using the "nexus" approach to determine whether a website should be governed by the americans with disabilities act, 79 St. John's L. Rev. 1313 (2005).

Kara Grimes, Casenote: Discrimination - americans with disabilities act - united states district court for the southern district of florida holds that an internet website is not a place of public accommodation:, 69 J. Air L. & Com. 203 (2004).

David Heffernan, The US Government prepares to make non-US airlines subject to new rules regardin the transportation of disabled passenger., 29 Air & Space L. 245 (2004).

David Heffernan, The US Government prepares to make non-US airlines subject to new rules regarding the transportaion of disabled passenger., 29 Air & Space L. 245 (2004).

Michael S. Heyl, Note. Circumventing environmental policy: does the Americans with Disabilities Act provide protection where environment statues don't?, 18 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 323 (2001).

William C. Hollis, III, Rights is people with disabilities to emergency evacuation under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990., 5 J. Health Care L. Pol'y 524 (2002).

Russell D. Hymas & Brett R. Parkinson, Architectural barriers under the ADA: an answer to the judiciary's struggle with technical non-compliance., 39 Cal. W. L. Rev. 349 (2003).

Maryann Jones, And access for all: accommodating individuals with disabilities in the California courts, 32 U.S.F. L. Rev. 75 (1997).

Maryann Jones, And access for all: accomodating individuals with disabilities in the California courts., 32 U.S.F. L. Rev. 75 (1997).

Nancy J. King, Website Access for Customers with Disabilities: Can We Get There from Here?, 2003 UCLA Journal of Law and Technology 6 (2003).

Latresa McLawhorn, Recent development. Leveling the accessibility playing field: section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act., 3 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 63 (2001).

Charles D. Mockbee IV, Comment: Caught in the web of the internet: The application of the americans with disabilities act of online businesses, 28 S. Ill. U. L.J. 553 (2004).

Charles D. Mockbee V, Caught in the Web of the Internet: The Application of the Americans With Disabilities Act to Online Businesses, 28 Southern Illinois University Law Journal Spring, 2004 553 (2004).

Peter J. Molesso, CRITICAL POINT IN THE DISABILITIES MOVEMENT: HOW WILL TENNESSEE V. LANE AFFECT CLAIMS BROUGHT UNDER TITLE II OF THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT?, 80 St. John's Law Review Spring, 2006 693 (2006).

Edward L. Myers III, Disability and Technology, 65 Mont. L. Rev. 289 (2004).

Karen Nutter, Domestic violence in the lives of women with disabilities: no (accessible) shelter from the storm., S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 13 329 (2004).

Michael J. Pappas, Introduction, 5 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 1 (2002).

Laurence Paradis, Symposium, Development in Disability Rights: Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Making Programs, Services, and Activities Accessible to All, 14 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev 389 (2003).

Laurence Paradis, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Making Programs, Services, and Activites Accessible to All, 14 Stanford Law & Policy Review 389 (2003).

Kathleen Pearson, Comment. Let's all go to the Dairy Queen without Margo!: the liability of franchisors under title III of the American with Disabilities Act after Neff v. American Dairy Queen Corp., 101 Dick. L. Rev. 137 (1996).

Lee A. Perselay, A hot dog at the ballgame: looking at the physical accessibility of professional baseball stadiums in northern New England, 38 N.H. B.J. 72 (1997).

Lee A. Perselay, A hot dog at the ballgame: looking at the physical accessibility of professional baseball stadiums in northern New England., 38 N.H. B.J. 72 (1997).

Justin D. Petruzzelli, Note. Adjust your font size: websites are public accommodations under the American with Disabilities Act., 53 Rutgers L. Rev. 1063 (2001).

Jeffrey Scott Ranen, Note. Was blind but now I see: the argument of ADA applicability to the internet., 22 B.C. Third World L.J. 389 (2002).

Jessica L. Roberts, AN AREA OF REFUGE: DUE PROCESS ANALYSIS AND EMERGENCY EVACUATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, 13 Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law Fall, 2005 127 (2005).

Cassandra Burke Robertson, Student article. Providing access to the future: how the Americans with Disabilities Act can remove barriers in cyberspace, 79 Denv. U.L. Rev. 199 (2001).

Adam M. Schloss, Web-sight for visually-disabled people: does Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act apply to Internet Websites?, 35 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 35 (2001).

David L. Schwan, THE TENTH ANNUAL FRANKEL LECTURE: NOTE*: "WHEN YOU COME TO A FORK IN THE ROAD, TAKE IT!": TENNESSEE V. LANE TAKES A NEW APPROACH TO SECTION FIVE ENFORCEMENT POWERS, 43 Houston Law Review 235 (2006).

Jaclyn Sheehan, THE ADA'S APPLICATION TO FOREIGN-FLAGGED CRUISE SHIPS: THE SUPREME COURT'S PRECEDENT IN SPECTOR V. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE TRANSCENDS THE UNITED STATES' BORDERS, 12 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law Summer, 2006 665 (2006).

James N. Spolar, Comment. I hear ya' knockin', so you can come in: the Americans with Disabilities Act limited to physical structures and individualized discrimination under(Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 121 F3d 1006, 6th Cir. 1997, en banc, cert. denied.), 24 J. Corp. L. 105 (1998).

Laura Michelle Stewart, TAKE FLIGHT BY CYBER-SIGHT: THE FAILURE OF COURTS TO REQUIRE THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TITLE III PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS PROVISION TO GOVERN PUBLIC PLACES SUCH AS AN AIRLINE'S WEBSITE, 30 Dayton Law Review 275 (2005).

Michael Waterstone, Civil rights and the administration of elections - toward secret ballots and polling place access., 8 J. Gender Race & Just. 101 (2004).

Perry A. Zirkel, Book Review: "AT BEST AN INEXACT SCIENCE": DELIMITING THE LEGAL CONTOURS OF SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY ELIGIBILITY UNDER THE IDEA THE LEGAL MEANING OF SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION ELIGIBILITY, 36 Journal of Law and Education January, 2007 155 (2007).

Accommodations

Note. Toward a reasonable equality: accommodating learning disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1560 (1998).

Symposium: Individual rights and reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 46 Depaul L. Rev. 871 (1997).

Article: Barriers to accessible housing: Enforce-ment issues in "design and construction" cases under the fair housing act*, 40 U. Rich. L. Rev. 753 (2006).

Kristin P. Abbinante, TAMING THE NATURE OF THE BEAST: WHY A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR A PERCEIVED DISABILITY SHOULD NO LONGER BE CONSIDERED THE ADA'S NECESSARY EVIL, 32 University of Dayton Law Review Fall, 2006 63 (2006).

Suzanne Abram, Student article. Reasonable accommodations for learning-disabled university students under the ADA, 28 J.L. & Educ. 121 (1999).

Cheryl L. Anderson, What is "Because of the Disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Reasonable Accommodation, Causation, and the Windfall Doctrine, 27 Berkely Journal of Employment and Labor Law 323 (2006).

Jonathan D. Andrews, Reconciling the Split: Affording Reasonable Accommodation to Employees "Regarded As" Disabled Under the ADA - An Exercise in Statutory Interpretation, 110 Penn State Law Review Spring, 2006 977 (2006).

Sandy Andrikopoulos & Theo E.M. Gould, Note. Living in harmony? Reasonable accomodations, employee expectations and ... (U.S. Airways, Inc. v. Barnett, 535 U.S. 391, 2002.), 20 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 345 (2003).

John R. Autry, Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA: Are Employers Required to Participate in the Interactive Process? The Courts Say "Yes" but the Law Says "No", 79 Chicago-Kent Law Review 665 (2004).

Carlos A. Ball, Preferential Treatment and Reasonable Accommodation Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 55 Alabama Law Review Summer, 2004 951 (2004).

Janet Barbookles, Comment. Creating reasonable accomodations without an undue burden: the future effects the ADA will have on golf courses., 33 Golden Gate U. L. REv. 71 (2003).

Stephen F. Befort, The most difficult ADA reasonable accomodation issues: reassignment and leave of absence., 37 Wake Forest L. Rev. 439 (2002).

Stephen F. Befort, Accommodation at work: lessons from the Americans with Disabilities Act and possibilities for alleviating the american worker time crunch., 13 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 3 615 (2004).

Stephen F. Befort, The Most Difficult ADA Reasonable Accommodation Issues: Reassignment and Leave of Absence, 37 Wake Forest Law Review 439 (2002).

Jeffrey S. Berenholz, Note. The development of reassignment to a vacant position in the Americans with Disabilities Act, 15 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 635 (1998).

Lauren W. Berns, Jr., Recent Development: Public Employment: ADA, Disability: Wood v. Green, 323 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2003), 33 Stetson L. Rev. 823 (2004).

Lauren W. Berns, Jr., RECENT DEVELOPMENT: PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT: ADA, DISABILITY: Wood v. Green, 323 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2003), 33 Stetson Law Review Winter, 2004 823 (2004).

Polly Blakemore, Note. Short of money or shortchanged?: reasonable accommodations in rental rules and policies for disabled individuals receiving financial assistance, 39 Brandeis L.J. 449 (2000).

Brian Bolton, THE BATTLE FOR THE ARMREST REACHES NEW HEIGHTS: THE AIR CARRIERS ACCESS ACT AND THE ISSUES SURROUNDING THE AIRLINES' POLICY OF REQUIRING OBESE PASSENGERS TO PURCHASE ADDITIONAL TICKETS, 69 Journal of Air Law and Commerce Fall, 2004 803 (2004).

Lisa Brodoff, Susan McClellan & Elizabeth Anderson, Access to justice--a call for civil gideon: The ADA: One avenue to appointed counsel before a full civil gideon, 2 Seattle J. Soc. Just. 609 (2004).

Barbara L. Campbell, Casenote. Did the Supreme Court further cloud, rather than clarify the "reasonable accomodation" requirement under the Americans with Disabilities Act, in light of Barnett? (U.S. Airways Inc., v. Barnett, 196 F.3d 979, 9th Cir. 1999.), 28 T. Marshall L. Rev. 101 (2002).

Matthew M. Cannon, Mending a Monumental Mountain: Resolving Two Critical Circuit Splits Unter the Americans with Disabilities Act for the Sake of Logic, Unity, and the Mentally Disabled, 2006 Brigham Young University Law Review 529 (2006).

Lynn M. Carroll, Employment Law -- Extending Reasonable Accommodations to Qualified Employees "Regarded As" Disabled Under the Americans with Disabilites Act -- Williams v. Philadelphia Housing Authority Police Department, 380 F.3d 751 (3d Cir. 2004), 40 Suffolk University Law Review 281 (2006).

Marc Charmatz, Antoinette McRae, ACCESS TO THE COURTS: A BLUEPRINT FOR SUCCESSFUL LITIGATION UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND THE REHABILITATION ACT, 3 Margins Law Journal Fall, 2003 333 (2003).

Thomas N. Chirikos, Will the costs of accommodating workers with disabilities remain low?, Behav. Sci. & L. 93 (1999).

Phyllis G. Coleman & Robert M. Jarvis, Tuition adjustment for law school students: a necessary accommodation under the ADA?, 24 J.C. & U.L. 45 (1997).

Cynthia A. Crain, THE STRUGGLE FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR "REGARDED AS" DISABLED INDIVIDUALS, 74 University of Cincinnati Law Review Fall, 2005 167 (2005).

Mary Crossley, Reasonable accommodation as part and parcel of the antidiscirmination project., 35 Rutgers L.J. 861 (2004).

Mary Crossley, Reasonable Accommodation as Part and Parcel of the Antidiscrimination Project, 35 Rutgers Law Journal Spring, 2004 861 (2004).

Stephen F. Defort & Tracey H. Donesky, Reassignment under the Americans with Disabilities Act: reasonable accommodation, affirmative action, or both?, 57 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1045 (2000).

Allen Dudley, Comment. Rights to reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act for "regarded as" disabled individuals, 5 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 389 (1999).

Curtis D. Edmonds, Won't You Let Me Take You on a Sea Cruise: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Cruise Ships, 28 Tulane Maritime Law Journal Summer, 2004 271 (2004).

Lisa Eichhorn, Reasonable accommodations and awkward compromises: issues concerning learning disabled students and professional schools in the law school context, 26 J.L. & Educ. 31 (1997).

Kellyann Everly, A REASONABLE BURDEN: THE NEED FOR A UNIFORM BURDEN OF PROOF SCHEME IN REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION CLAIMS, 29 Dayton Law Review Fall, 2003 37 (2003).

Nicholas R. Frazier, In the Land Between Two Maps: Perceived Disabilities, Reasonable Accommodations, and Judicial Battles over the ADA, 62 Washington & Lee Law Review Fall, 2005 1759 (2005).

Leslie Goddard, Searching for balance in the ADA; recent developments in the legal and practical issues of reasonable accommodation, 35 Idaho L. Rev. 227 (1999).

David J. Gold, Employment Law -- Eleventh Circuit Requires Employers to Provide Reasonable Accommodations to Employees Erroneously Regarded as Disabled -- D'Angelo v. Conagra Foods, Inc., 422 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2005), 40 Suffolk University Law Review 261 (2006).

Jared Hager, Note. Bowling for certainty: picking up the seven-ten split by pinning down the reasonableness of reassignment after Barnett, 87 Minn. L. Rev. 2063 (2003).

Kymberly D. Hankinson, Comment. Navigating between a rock and a hard place: an employer's obligation to reasonably accommodate the disabled in the unionized workplace, 15 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 245 (1998).

John J. Jacko III, UNCLE SAM OFFERS SMALL LAW OFFICES MORE REASON TO PROMOTE EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE ACCESS, 25 No. 12 Of Counsel 12 December, 2006 12 (2006).

Pamela S. Karlan & George Rutherglen, Disabilities, discrimination and reasonable accommodation, 46 Duke L.J. 1 (1996).

Jill S. Kingsbury, "Must we talk about that reasonable accommodation?": The Eighth Circuit says yes, but is the answer reasonable? (Fjellstad v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc., 188 F.3d 944, 8th Cir. 1999.), 65 Mo. L. Rev. 967 (2000).

Lt. Colin A. Kisor, Using interpreters to assist jurors: a plea for consistency, 22 Chicano-Latino L. Rev. 37 (2001).

Faye Kuo, Comment: Open and closed: Captioning technology as a means to equality, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 159 (2004).

Aaron Matthew Laing, Comment. Failure to accomodate, disciminatory intent, and the McDonnell Douglas framework: distinquishing the analyses of claims arising under subparts (A) and (B) of section 12112(b)(5) of the ADA., 77 Wash. L. Rev. 913 (2002).

Janai Powell Lane, Are web sites a " public accomodation" under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") requiring reasonable access for persons with disabilities?, 21 Legal Ref. Serv. Q 75 (2002).

Craig S. Lerner, "Accommodations" for the Learning Disabled: A Level Playing Field or Affirmative Action for Elites?, 57 Vanderbilt Law Review April, 2004 1043 (2004).

Thad LeVar, Note. Why an employer does not have to answer for preventing an employee with a disability from utilizing corrective measures: the relationship between mitigation and reasonable accommodation. (Nawrot v. CPC International, No. 99 C 630, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8973, N.D. III. June 21, 2001, 16 BYU J. Pub. L. 69 (2001).

Alex B. Long, A good walk spoiled: Casey Martin and the ADA's reasonable accommodation requirement in competitive settings, 77 Or. L. Rev. 1337 (1998).

Alex B. Long, The ADA's Reasonable Accommodation Requirement and "Innocent Third Parties", 68 Mo. L. Rev. 863 (2003).

Jarad M. Lucan, Why Giving Traditional Reasonable Accommodation to "regarded as" Disabled Individuals Brings about "bizarre results", 25 Quinnipiac Law Review 417 (2006).

Lynn Paul Mattson, THE DISABILITIES LITIGATION EXPLOSION: THE MUTUAL DUTY TO EXPLORE REASONABLE ACCOMODATION AND THE NEW FEDERAL 'TICKET TO WORK' LAW, 71 The Oklahoma Bar Journal 2819 (2000).

William J. McDevitt, Seniority systems and the Americans with Disabilities Act: the fate of "reasonable accommodation" after Eckles, 9 St. Thomas L. Rev. 359 (1997).

Timothy J. McFarlin, IF THEY ASK FOR A STOOL... RECOGNIZING REASONABLE ACCOMODATION FOR EMPLOYEES "REGARDED AS" DISABLED, 49 Saint Louis University Law Journal Spring, 2005 927 (2005).

Laura K. McKibbin, The ADA Takes On the Movie Industry: Do the Disabled Have a Right to the Best Seats in the House?, 38 University of San Francisco Law Review Summer, 2004 831 (2004).

Douglas Menikheim and Frederick R. Trelfa, Note, Stepping Out of the Courtroom and into the Personnel Department: An Analysis of Reasonable Accommodation and Disparate Impact in Raytheon V. Hernandez, 22 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 235 (2004).

Elizabeth Mills, How Bizarre? The Application of Reasonable Accommodation to Employees "Regarded As" Disabled Under the ADA Does Not Necessarily Lead to Bizarre Results, 75 Mississippi Law Journal Spring, 2006 1063 (2006).

Michael D. Moberly, Letting Katz out of the bag: the employer's duty to accommodate perceived disabilities, 30 Ariz. L. Rev. 603 (1998).

Frances M. Nicastro, The Americans with Disabilities Act: determining which learning disabilities qualify for reasonable accommodations, 26 J. Legis 355 (2000).

Sarah J. Parrot, The ADA and Reasonable Accommodation of Employees Regarded as Disabled: Statutory Fact or Bizarre Fiction?, 67 Ohio State Law Journal 1495 (2006).

Elizabeth A. Pendo, Disability, doctors and dollars: distinguishing the three faces of reasonable accommodation, 35 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1175 (2002).

Elizabeth A. Pendo, Disability, doctors and dollars: distiguishing the three faces of reasonable accomodation., 35 UC Davis L. Rev. 1175 (0).

Elizabeth A. Pendo, DISABILITY, DOCTORS AND DOLLARS: DISTINGUISHING THE THREE FACES OF REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION, 35 U.C. Davis Law Review June 2002 1175 (2002).

Sean Pevsner, Note. Reasonable accomodations as constitutional obligations. (Garrett v. University of Alabama, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 7 Tex. F. on C.L. & C.R. 317 (2002).

Polly Beth Proctor, Article: Determining 'reasonable accommodation' under the ADA: Understanding employer and employee rights and obligations during the interactive process, 33 Sw. U. L. Rev. 51 (2003).

PollyBeth Proctor, DETERMINING 'REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION' UNDER THE ADA: UNDERSTANDING EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS DURING THE INTERACTIVE PROCESS, 33 Southwestern University Law Review 51 (2003).

Kristopher J. Ring, Disabling the Split: Should Reasonable Accommodations Be Provided to "Regarded as" Disabled Individuals Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)?, 20 Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 311 (2006).

Lawrence D. Rosenthal, Requiring individuals to use mitigating measures in reasonable accomodation cases after the Sutton trilogy: putting the brakes on a potential runaway train. , 54 S.C. L. Rev. 421 (2002).

Lawrence D. Rosenthal, Article: Reasonable accommodation for individuals regarded as having disabilities under the americans with disabilities act? Why "no" should not be the answer, 36 Seton Hall L. Rev. 895 (2006).

Lawrence D. Rosenthal, Reasonable Accomodations for Individuals Regarded as Having Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Why "No" Should Not Be the Answer, 36 Seton Hall Law Review 0 (2006).

Laura F. Rothstein, The employer's duty to accommodate performance and conduct deficiencies of individuals with mental impairments under disability discrimination laws, 47 Syracuse L. Rev. 931 (1997).

Helen A. Schartz, Kevin M. Schartz, D.J. Hendricks, & Peter Blanck, WORKPLACE ACCOMMODATIONS: EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CURRENT EMPLOYEES, 75 Mississippi Law Journal Spring, 2006 917 (2006).

Estella J. Schoen, Note. Does the ADA make exceptions in a unionized workplace? the conflict between the reassignment provision of the ADA and collectively bargained seniority systems, 82 Minn. L. Rev. 1391 (1998).

Robert L. Schonfeld, "Reasonable accommodation" under the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act, 25 Fordham Urb. L.J. 413 (1998).

Alan D. Schuchman, Note. The holy and the handicapped: an examination of the different applications of the reasonable accommodation clauses in Title VII and the ADA, 73 Ind. L.J. 745 (1998).

Stewart J.Schwab & Steven L. Wilborn, Reasonable accommodation of workplace disabilities, 44 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1197 (2003).

Gregory Scolieri & Matthew H. Woodard, Note. A call for clarification: achieving a uniform proof structure in reasonable accomodation cases under the Americans with Disabilities Act., 20 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 117 (2002).

Adam J. Shapiro, Defining the Rights of Law Students with Mental Disabilities, 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 923 (2004).

Sam Silverman, The ADA interactive process: the employer and employee's duty to work together to identify a reasonable accommodation is more than a game of five card stud, 77 Neb. L. Rev. 281 (1998).

Anita Silvers, Protection or privilege? reasonable accommodation, reverse discrimination, and the fair costs of repairing recognition for disabled people in the workforce., 8 J. Gender Race & Just. 3 561 (2005).

Blake Sonne, Employment Law: Reasonable Accommodation Under the Americans with Disabilities Act vs. Employee Seniority Rights: Understanding the Real Conflict in U.S. Airways v. Barnett, 57 Oklahoma Law Review Spring, 2004 225 (2004).

Belinda Spaeth, AKA v. Washington Hospital Center and Kralik v. Durbin: Is it "reasonable" to require an employer to accommodate an ADA plaintiff when doing so violates the collectively bargained seniority rights of other employees?, 42 St. Louis U. L.J. 989 (1998).

Michael Ashley Stein, Generalizing Disability: Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 1373 (2004).

Michael Ashley Stein, Same struggle, different difference: ADA accommodations as antidiscrimination., 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 579 (2004).

Michael Ashley Stein, SAME STRUGGLE, DIFFERENT DIFFERENCE: ADA ACCOMMODATIONS AS ANTIDISCRIMINATION, 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review December, 2004 579 (2004).

Kelly Cahill Timmons, Accomidating misconduct under the Americans with Disabilites Act., 57 Fla. L. Rev. 2 187 (2005).

Kelly Cahill Timmons, LIMITING "LIMITATIONS": THE SCOPE OF THE DUTY OF REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 57 South Carolina Law Review 313 (2006).

J.H. Verkerke, Disaggregatgin antidiscrimination and accommodation, 44 Wm. & Mary L.Rev. 1385 (2003).

James J. Weisman, Dignity and non-discrimination: the requirement of "reasonable accommodation" in disability law, 23 Fordham Urban L.J. 1235 (1996).

W. Ray Williams, Hand-up or handout? The Americans with Disabilities Act and "unreasonable accommodation" of learning disabled bar applicants: toward a new paradigm, 34 Creighton L. Rev. 611 (2001).

Maria N. Worthington, SOLBERG v. MAJERLE MGMT.: REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR A TENANTS' DISABILITY BY THE LANDLORD MAY BE LIMITED, 36 The University of Baltimore Law Forum Fall, 2005 93 (2005).

Matthew Graham Zagrodzky, When employees become disabled: does the Americans with Disabilities Act require consideration of a transfer as a reasonable accommodation?, 38 S. Tex. L. Rev. 939 (1997).

Joe Zopolsky, HIV-infected healthcare workers and prctice modification, 78 N.D. L. Rev. 77 (2002).

ADA Jurisprudence

Garrett, Disability Policy, and Federalism: a symposium on Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett. Articles by Anne Colker, Adam Milani, William H. Pryor Jr. and Ronald D. Rotunda, 53 Ala. L. Rev. 1075 (2002).

Recent Cases, Americans with Disabilities Act - Ninth Circuit Holds That Movie Theaters Must Provide Comparable Viewing Angles for Patrons in Wheelchairs. - Oregon Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Regal Cinemas, Inc., 339 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2003)., 117 Harv. L. Rev. 727 (2003).

John Christopher Anderson, Three generations later and still no class: protecting Americans with disabilities under 42 U.S.C. section 1985 (3), the Ku Klux Klan Act, 47 Drake L. Rev. 537 (1999).

Katherine R. Annas, Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams: part of an emerging trend of Supreme Court cases narrowing the scope of the ADA., 81 N.C. L. Rev. 835 (2003).

Samuel R. Bagenstos, The Supreme Court, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Rational Discrimination, 55 Alabama Law Review Summer, 2004 923 (2004).

Samuel R. Bagenstos, JUSTICE GINSBURG AND THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN EXPANDING "WE THE PEOPLE": THE DISABILITY RIGHTS CASES, 104 Columbia Law Review January, 2004 49 (2004).

Samuel R. Bagenstos, The Perversity of Limited Civil Rights Remedies: The Case of "Abusive" ADA Litigation, 54 UCLA Law Review October, 2006 1 (2006).

Susan Bandes, Fear and degradation in Alabama: the emotional subtext of University of Alabama v. Garrett., 5 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 520 (2003).

Harry Beatty, Ontario disability support program: policy and implementation, 14 J.L. & Soc. Pol'y 1 (1999).

Anne E. Beaumont, Note. This estoppel has got to stop: judicial estoppel and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 71 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1529 (1996).

Stephen F. Befort & Holly Lindquist Thomas, The ADA in turmoil: judicial dissonance, the Supreme Court's response and the future of disability discrimination law, 78 Or. L. Rev. 27 (1999).

Lawrence Berliner, A survey of significant ADA Title II and Title III decisions within the second circuit, 15 QLR 537 (1996).

Lawrence Berliner, An evolving Americans with Disabilities Act, a survey of decisions involving public entities and places of public accommodation from courts within the Second Circuit, 17 QLR 633 (1998).

Josh Bernstein, The efforts of Texas courts to disable disability law in Texas, 2 Tex. F. on C.L. & C.R. 43 (1995).

William Booth, Student article. Survival under the ADA: the federal common law standard for determining survival claims, 2 DePaul J. Health Care L. 269 (1998).

Pamela Brandwein & Richard K. Scotch, The gender analogy in the disability discrimination literature, 62 Ohio St. L.J. 465 (2001).

Pamela Brandwein, Constitutional doctrine as paring tool: the struggle for "relevant: evidence in University of Alabama v. Garrett, 35 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 37 (2001).

Charles D. Brown, Congressional abrogation of Eleventh Amendment immunity by passing the ADEA and the ADA, 51 Baylor L. Rev. 339 (1999).

Judith Olans Brown & Wendy E. Parmet, The imperial sovereign: sovereign immunity & the ADA, 35 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 1 (2001).

Jennifer Gozdowski Brown, Comment. Mitigating measures and the ADA after Sutton: can employers limit our ability to care for ourselves in the workplace? (Sutton v. United Airlines Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 1999.), 7 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 113 (2003).

Timothy J. Cahill and Betsy Malloy, OVERCOMING THE OBSTACLES OF GARRETT: AN "AS APPLIED" SAVING CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ADA'S TITLE II, 39 Wake Forest Law Review Spring, 2004 133 (2004).

J. William Cain, Jr., The "most integrated setting" regulation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 34-SPG Ark. Law. 8 (1999).

Sandra J. Carnahan, The Americans with Disabilities Act in state correctional institutions, 27 Cap. U. L. Rev. 291 (1999).

Mita Chatterjee, Casenote. Access denied and not designed: the Ninth Circuit drafts a narrow escape for architect liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act in...(Lonberg v. Sanborn Theaters, Inc., 259 F.3d 1029, 9th Cir. 2001.), 9 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 293 (2002).

Jennifer Chorpening, A colloquium on the jurisprudence of mercy: Capital punishment and clemency: Comment: Genetic disability: A modest proposal to modify the ADA to protect against some forms of genetic discrimination, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 1441 (2004).

James P. Colgate, If you build it, can they sue? Architects' liability under Title III of the ADA, 68 Fordham L. Rev. 137 (1999).

Ruth Colker & James J. Brudney, Dissing Congress, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 80 (2001).

Ruth Colker & Adam Milani, The post-Garrett world: insufficient state protection against disability discrimination, 53 Ala. L. Rev. 1075 (2002).

Beth Collins, Comment. The Americans with Disabilities Act: rehabilitating congressional intent, 28 J. Legis. 213 (2002).

Christopher Cowan, AN UNWORKABLE RULE OF LAW: THE ADA, EDUCATION, AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY; AN ARGUMENT FOR OVERRULING SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA V. FLORIDA CONSISTENT WITH STARE DECISIS, 80 Southern California Law Review January, 2007 347 (2007).

Kimberly E. Dean, Note. In light of the evil presented: what kind of prophylactic antidiscrimination legislation can Congress enact after Garrett?, 43 B.C. L. Rev. 697 (2002).

Denise Decell, Comment. Bragdon v. Abbott: A case of HIV as perceived disability under The Americans With Disabilities Act, 73 St. John's L. Rev. 933 (1999).

Nancy Lawler Dickhute, Jury duty for the blind in the time of reasonable accommodations: the ADA's interface with a litigant's right to a fair trail, 32 Creighton L. Rev. 849 (1999).

Lisa Eichhorn, Applying the ADA to mitigating measures cases: a choice of statutory evils, 31 Ariz. St. L. J. 1071 (1999).

Lisa Eichhorn, THE CHEVRON TWO-STEP AND THE TOYOTA SIDESTEP: DANCING AROUND THE EEOC'S "DISABILITY" REGULATIONS UNDER THE ADA, 39 Wake Forest Law Review Spring, 2004 177 (2004).

Marita Skye Erbeck, Casenote. Eleventh and Fourteenth Amendments--Americans with Disabilities Act (Board of Trustees of University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 12 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 555 (2002).

William D. Evans, ADA and the workplace: the Supreme Court's 2002 ADA trilogy., 39 Tenn. B.J. 12 (2003).

Keith R. Fentonmiller & Herbert Semmel, Where age and disability discrimination intersect: an overview of the ADA for the ADEA practitioner, 10 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 227 (2000).

Leanne Mashburn Foster, Note. Asymptomatic HIV-infection and its place within the Americans with Disabilities Act after...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.), 43 St. Louis U. L.J. 177 (1999).

Aaron David Frishberg, The Americans with Disablities Act and the Supreme Court: towards a strategic perspective., 59 Guild Practitioner 193 (2002).

Jonathan C. Fritts, Note. "Down in front!": judicial deference, regulatory interpretation, and the ADA's line of sight standard, 86 Geo. L.J. 2653 (1998).

Jeffrey Gerish, Abandoning congressional intent: modern-day applications of the ADA, 1997 Det. C.L. Rev. 805 (1997).

Michael H. Gottesman, Disability, federalism, and a court with an eccentric mission, 62 Ohio St. L.J. 31 (2001).

Joseph Groshong, Comment: Curbing state discrimination against disabled drivers: Why the disabled need not pay the states to participate in disabled parking programs, 33 Steon Hall L. Rev. 811 (2003).

Thomas P. Guarino, IDEA and ADA - do the exhaustion requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 1415 apply to actions under the ADA?, 15 Glendale L. Rev. 1 (1996).

Ashley W. A. Hammercih, Tennessee v. Lane: Money Damages under the ADA, 13 0 (0).

Ashley W. A. Hammercih, Tennessee v. Lane: Money Damages under the ADA, 13 The Digest 111 (2005).

Roger C. Hartley, Enforcing federal civil rights against public entities after Garrett, 28 J.C. & U.L. 41 (2001).

Roger C. Hartley, The new federalism and the ADA; State sovereign immunity from private damage suits after Boern, 24 Rev. L. & Soc. Change 481 (1998).

Wendy F. Hensel, Interacting with others: a major life activity under the Americans with Disabilities Act?, 2002 Wis. L. Rev. 1139 (2002).

J. Andrew Hirth, We Were Only Teasing: The Eighth Circuit Misses the Quintessence of Hostile Work Environment Claims Under the ADA, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 253 (2005).

Brian M. Holt, Comment. Genetically defective: the judicial interpretation of the Americans with Disabilities Act fails to protect against genetic discrimination in the workplace., 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 457 (2002).

Kimberly Horvath, Does Bragdon v. Abbott provide the missing link for infertile couples seeking protection under ADA?, 4 DePaul J. Health Care L. 819 (1999).

Seth A. Horvath, DISENTANGLING THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES FOR STATE-INITIATED DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE I AND TITLE II, 2004 University of Illinois Law Review 231 (2004).

John V. Jacobi, Federal power, segregation, and mental disability., 39 Hous. L. Rev. 1231 (2003).

Mark A. Johnson, Note. A flawed standard yields a predictable result. (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 121 S. Ct. 955, 2001.), 60 Md. L. Rev. 393 (2001).

Jessica L. Johnson, The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: The incredible shrinking legislation? A closer look at Chevron v Echazabal and the expansion of the direct threat defense., 32 Cap. U. L. Rev. 761 (2004).

Michael W. Kelly, Note. Weakening Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act: the Buckhannon decision and other developments limiting private enforcement., 10 Elder L.J. 361 (2002).

Michelle R. King & Beth S. Herr, The consequences and implications of a case-by-case analysis under the Americans with Disabilities Act for asymptomatic HIV-positive gay men and lesbians post Bragdon, 8 Law & Sexuality: Rev. Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues 531 (1998).

Catherine J. Lanctot, Ad hoc decision making and per se prejudice: how individualizing the determination of "disability" undermined the ADA, 42 Vill. L. Rev. 327 (1997).

Geoffrey Landward, Note. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett and the Equal Education Opportunity Act: another act bites the dust. (Bd. of Trustees of the U. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 2002 BYU Educ. & L.J. 313 (2002).

David J. Langeland, MISAPPLICATION OF PRECEDENT: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IGNORES THE OVERBREADTH OF THE ADA BY ABROGATING STATE SOVEREIGNTY IN TENNESSEE V. LANE, 38 Creighton Law Review June, 2005 1065 (2005).

Jeffery W. Larroca, Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams: disabling the Americans with Disabilities Act., 19 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 363 (2002).

Jeffrey W. Larroca, Note. Disabling the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184, 2002.), 19 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 363 (2002).

Jennifer Lav, Note. Conceptualizations of disability and the constitutionality of remedial schemes under the Americans with Disabilities Act., 34 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 197 (2002).

James Leonard, A damaged remedy: disability discrimination claims against state entities under the Americans with Disabilities Act after Seminole Tribe and Flores, 41 Ariz. L. Rev. 651 (1999).

James Leonard, Symposium. The shadows of unconstitutionality: how the new federalism may affect the anti-discrimination mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 52 Ala. L. Rev. 91 (2000).

Brian Lester, Student article. The Americans with Disabilities Act and the exclusion of inmates from services in prisons: a proposed analytical approach regarding the appropriate level of judicial scutiny of a prisoner's ADA claim., 79 N.D. L. Rev. 83 (2003).

S. Elizabeth Wilborn Malloy, Something borrowed, something blue: why disability law clains are different, 33 Comm. L. Rev. 603 (2001).

Samuel A. Marcosson, Of square pegs and round holes: the supreme court's ongoing "title VII-ization" of the Americans with Disabilities Act., 8 J. Gender Race & Just. 361 (2004).

Elizabeth Keadle Markey, Note. The ADA's last stand?: Standing and the Americans with Disabilities Act., 71 Fordham L. Rev. 185 (2002).

Arlene B. Mayerson, Symposium. Restoring regard for the "regarded as" prong: giving effect to congressional intent, 42 Vill. L. Rev. 587 (1997).

Heather R. McDonald, Note. Garrett under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act: its broad implications to civil rights laws. (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 52 DePaul L. Rev. 993 (2003).

Megan McMillan, TRADING CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES FOR POLICY ENDS: AN IDEOGRAPHIC STUDY OF DISABILITY INTEREST GROUP AND AGENCY RESPONSE TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA V. GARRETT, 5 The Journal of Law in Society Winter, 2004 501 (2004).

Steven Mendelsohn, Martin Gould, When the Americans with Disabilities Act Goes Online: Application of the ADA to the Internet and the World Wide Web, 7 Computer Law Review & Technology Journal Winter, 2004 173 (2004).

Gillian E. Metzger, FACIAL CHALLENGES AND FEDERALISM, 105 Columbia Law Review April, 2005 873 (2005).

Michael D. Meuti, Note. Disabling legislation: the judicial erosion of the ADA's protection for employees with psychiatric disorders., 14 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 445 (2003).

Michael D. Meuti, Features and Notes: Disabling Legislation: The Judicial Erosion of the ADA's Protection for Employees with Psychiatric Disorders, 14 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev 445 (2003).

Michael D. Meuti, Disabling Legislation: The Judicial Erosion of the ADA's Protection for Employess with Psychiatric Disorders, 14 Stanford Law & Policy Review 445 (2003).

Adam A. Milani, WHEELCHAIR USERS WHO LACK "STANDING": ANOTHER PROCEDURAL THRESHOLD BLOCKING ENFORCEMENT OF TITLES II AND III OF THE ADA, 39 Wake Forest Law Review Spring, 2004 69 (2004).

Paul Steven Miller, EEOC's enforcement of the ADA in the second circuit, 48 Syracuse L. Rev. 1577 (1998).

Paul Steven Miller, The Americans with Disabilities Act in Texas: the EEOC's continuing efforts in enforcement, 34 Hous. L. Rev. 777 (1997).

Paul Steven Miller, The EEOC's enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the Sixth Circuit, 48 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 217 (1998).

Christopher S. Morin, Flying the not-so-friendly skies: Charas v. TWA's definition of "service" under the ADA's preemption clause exposes airlines to tort liability, 65 J. Air L. & Com. 497 2000 (0).

Leah C. Myers, Disability harassment: how far should the ADA follow in the footsteps of Title VII?, 17 BYU J. Pub. L. 265 (2003).

Leah C. Myers, Disability harassment: How far should the ADA follow in the footsteps of Title VII?, 17 BYU J. Pub. L. 265 (2003).

Kathleen M. Nichols, Labor and Employment Law - Determining Employee Status for Evolving Business Associations Under the Americans with Disabilities Act- Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. Wells, 538 U.S. 440 (2003), 38 Suffolk University Law Review 239 (2004).

Stanton K. Oishi, Casenote. Abrogation of state sovereign immunity under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act after Board of Trustees v. Garrett. (Patricia N. v. LeMahieu, 141 F. Supp. 2d 1243, D. Haw. 2001.), 24 U. Hawaii L. Rev. 347 (2001).

Sarah N. Otwell, Note. Triumph for the working disabled or hollow procedural device? (Cleveland v. Policy Management Sys. Corp., 119 S. Ct. 15797, 1999.), 3 J. Health Care & Pol'y 452 (2000).

Caroline Palmer & Lynn Mickelson, Falling through the cracks: The unique circumstances of HIV disease under recent Americans with Disabilities Act caselaw and emerging privacy policies., 21 Law & Ineq. 219 (2003).

Todd Pauls, Asymptomatic HIV, reproduction, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: the disability dilemma in...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 912 F. Supp. 580, D. Me. 1997, aff'd, 107 F. 3.d 934, 1st Cir. 1997, aff'd, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.), 22 Hamline L. Rev. 633 (1999).

Jessica Perry, Note. The parent-child waiver testimonial priviledge: an argument for qualified recognition., 37 Brandeis L.J. 97 (1998).

K.G. Jan Pillai, Incongruent disproportionality, 29 Hastings Const. L.Q. 645 (2002).

Johanna Pirko, THE EROSION OF SEPARATION OF POWERS UNDER THE "CONGRUENCE AND PROPORTIONALITY" TEST: FROM RELIGIONS FREEDOM TO THE ADA, 53 Hastings Law Joural 519 (2001).

Steven Plitt, et al., Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett: is constitutional authority for sale and is state sovereign immunity the purchase price?, 13 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 151 (2003).

Aaron Ponzo, Title II of the Americans with Disabilites Act is a valid excercise of congress' power to abrogate state sovereign immunity: Tennessee v. Lane., 43 Duq. L. Rev. 2 317 (2005).

Aaron Ponzo, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act is a Valid Exercise of Congress' Power to Abrogate State Sovereign Immunity: Tennessee v. Lane, 43 Duquesne University Law Review Winter, 2005 317 (2005).

Russell Powell, Beyond lane: Who is protected by the Americans with Disabilites Act, who should be?, 82 Denv. U. L. Rev. 1 25 (2004).

Russell Powell, Beyond Lane: Who is Protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act, Who Should Be?, 82 Denver University Law Review 25 (2004).

William H. Pryor Jr., Madison's double security: in defense of federalism, the separation of powers, and the Rehnquist Court, 53 Ala. L. Rev. 1167 (2002).

Nicole S. Richter, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act after University of Alabama v. Garrett: should the states be immune from suit? (University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 77 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 879 (2002).

Robert A. Robinson, Note. Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle: WIll the conservative Supreme Court decide that the Eleventh Amendment shields state and local governments from the Americans with Disabilities Act?, 10 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 265 (2000).

Robert A. Robinson, Will the conservative Supreme Court decide that the Eleventh Amendment shields state and local governments from the Americans with Disabilities Act? (Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999, 8th Cir. 1999, cert. granted, see also Alsbrook v. Arkansas, 120 S. Ct. 1003, 2000, cert. dismissed, 120 S. Ct. 1265, 2000.), 10 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 265 (2000).

Kevin A. Rogers, Note. Meaningful judicial review: a protection of civil rights. (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 22 Miss. C. L. Rev. 101 (2002).

Yoni Rosenzweig, Recent Development, Tennessee v. Lane: Relaxing the Garrett Requirements for Civil Rights Legislation, 40 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 301 (2005).

Ronald D. Rotunda, The Eleventh Amendment, Garrett, and protection for civil rights, 53 Ala. L. Rev. 1183 (2002).

Louis S. Rulli & Jason A. Leckerman, Unfinished business: The fading promise of ADA enforcements in the federal courts under title I and its impact on the poor., 8 J. Gender Race & Just. J. Gender Race & Just. 595 (2005).

Michael L. Russell, The Americans with Disabilities Act and the Eleventh Amendment: do states have a license to discriminate?, 28 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 133 (2001).

Sarah Shaw, Comment. Why courts cannot deny ADA protection to plaintiffs who do not use available mitigating measures for their impairments., 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1981 (2002).

Joseph J. Shelton, Note. In the wake of Garrett: state law alternatives to the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 52 Cath. U. L. Rev. 837 (2003).

Christopher E. Sherer, The resurgence of federalism: state employees and the Eleventh Amendment, 23 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 1 (2001).

Joan Shinavski, Recent decision. The Eleventh Amendment bars private individuals from suing state employers for money damages under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 40 Duq. L. Rev. 161 (2001).

Anita Silvers & Michael Ashley, Disability, equal protection, and the Supreme Court: standing at the crossroads of progressive and retrogressive logic in constitutional classification, 35 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 235 (2001).

Pamela J. Simmons, Note. Does the end justify the means? the Fourth Circuit's new case-by-case analysis of an HIV-infected plaintiff's ADA claim after Bragdon v. Abbott, 34 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1251 (1999).

Melinda Slusser, Note. A step in the right direction. (Flowers v. Southern Regional Physician Services, 247 F.3d 229, 5th Cir. 2001, 33 U. Tol. L. Rev. 713 (2002).

Jefferson D. E. Smith & Steve P. Calandrillo, Forward to fundamental alteration: Addressing ADA Title II integration lawsuits after Olmstead v L, 24 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 695 (2001).

Aviam Soifer, Disabling the ADA: Essences, better angels, and unprincipled neutrality claims., 44 Wm & Mary L.Rev. 1285 (2003).

Robert L. Strayer II, Asserting the Seventh Amendment: an argument for the right to a jury trial when only back pay is sought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 795 (1999).

Paul V. Sullivan, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: an analysis of Title III and applicable case law, 29 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1117 (1995).

Jeffrey Swanson, Ph.D., Scott Burris, J.D., Kathryn Moss, PH. D., Michael Ullman, M.A. , Leah M. Ran, JUSTICE DISPARITIES: DOES THE ADA ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM TREAT PEOPLE WITH PSYCHIATRIC DISABILITIES FAIRLY?, 66 Maryland Law Review 94 (2006).

Matthew D. Taggart, Comment. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act after Garrett: defective abrogation of sovereign immunity and its remedial impact., 91 Cal. L. Rev. 827 (2003).

Holland M. Tahvonen, Notes. Disability-based harassment: standing and standards for a "new" cause of action., 44 Wm. & Mary L.Rev. 1489 (2003).

Hillina Taddesse Tamrat, Note. Sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment: Kimel and Garrett, what next for state employees? (Kimel v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 528 U.S. 62, 2000; and Bd. of Trustees of University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 11 Elder L.J. 171 (2003).

Alison Tanchyk, Comment. An Eleventh Amendment victory: the Eleventh Amendment vs. Title II of the ADA., 75 Temp. L. Rev. 675 (2002).

Sharlott K. Thompson, Hostile Work Environment Disability Harassment Under the ADA, 73 UMKC L. Rev. 715 (2005).

Carrie A. Thornton, Comment. Alcoholism and the ADA: divergent treatment by the federal courts, 54 SMU L. Rev. 2153 (0).

Carrie A. Thornton, Comment. Alcoholism and the ADA: divergent treatment by the federal courts, 54 SMU L. Rev. 2153 (2001).

Karen M. Volkman, Comment. The limits of coverage: do insurance policies obtained through an employer and administered by insurance companies fall within the scope of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act?, 43 St. Louis U.L.J. 249 (1999).

Michael E. Waterstone, Article: Lane, fundamental rights, and voting., 56 Ala. L. Rev. 793 (2005).

Michael Waterstone, The Untold Story of the Rest of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 58 Vand. L. Rev. 1807 (2005).

Mary Ann MacLaughlan Weicher, Case Comment, Administrative Law--No Chevron Deference for EEOC's Interpretation of "Disability" in Family and Medical Leave Act, 36 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 915 (2003).

Rebecca Hanner White, Deference and disability discrimination, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 532 (2000).

Jessica Lynne Wilson, Technology as panacea: why pregnancy-related problems whould be defined without regard to mitigating measures under the ADA, 52. Vand. L. Rev. 831 (1999).

Community-Based Care/Assisted Living

Andrew I. Batavia, A right to personal assistance services: "most integrated setting appropriate" requirements and the independent living model of long-term care, 27 Am. J.L. & Med. 17 (2001).

Andrew I. Batavia, The growing prominence of independent living and consumer direction as principles in long-term care: a content analysis and implications for elderly people with disabilities., 10 Elder L.J. 263 (2002).

Andrew I. Batavia, Disability rights in the third stage of independent living movement: disability community consensus, dissention, and the future of disability policy (excepts)., 14 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 347 (2003).

Melinda Bird, The integration of the ADA and the problem of de-institutionalization, 31 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 847 (1998).

Melissa Bowman, Note. Open debate over closed doors: the effect of the new developmental disabilities regulations on protection and advocacy programs, 85 Ky. L.J. 955 (1996).

Patricia A. Carlton, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act and child care centers: providing personal care attendants so children with disabilities may benefit from the Act, 23 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 1007 (1998).

Mary C. Cerreto, Olmstead: the Brown v. Board of Education for disability rights, 3 Loy. J. Pub. Int. L. 47 (2001).

Jeffrey W. Childers, Recent development. One small step for the continued parental support of disabled children beyond the age of majority in North Carolina. (Hendricks v. Sanks, 143 N.C. App. 544, 545 S.E.2d 779, 2001.), 80 N.C. L. Rev. 2094 (2002).

Michael J. Davis & Karen L. Gaus, Protecting group homes for the non-handicapped: zoning in the post-Edmonds era, 46 U. Kan. L. Rev. 777 (1998).

Erin Ziaja, Note. Do independent and assisted living communities violate the Fair Housing Amendments Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act?, 9 Elder L.J. 313 (2001).

Harriet McBryde Johnson & Lesly Bowers, Civil rights and long-term care: advocacy in the wake of Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring., 10 Elder L.J. 453 (2002).

Arlene Kanter, Abandoned But Not Forgotten: The Rights of Elderly People in State Psychiatric Institutions, 19 New York University Review of Law and Society Change 273 (1992).

Jane Perkins & Randolph Boyle, Symposium. Addressing long waits for home and community-based care through Medicaid and the ADA, 45 St. Louis U. L.J 117 (2001).

Michael L. Perlin, "Their promises of paradise": will Olmstead v. L.C. resuscitate the constitutional "least restrictive alternative" principle in mental disability law?, 37 Hous. L. Rev. 999 (2000).

Michael L. Perlin, "What's good is bad, what's bad is good, you'll find out when you reach the top, you're on the bottom": are the Americans with Disabilities Act (and Olmstead v. L.C.) anything more than "Idiot Wind"?, 35 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 235 (2001).

Sara Rosenbaum & Joel Teitelbaum, Olmstead v. L.C.: implications for Medicaid and other publicly funded health services, 12 Health Matrix 93 (2002).

Rachel Rubey, There's no place like home: housing for the most vulnerable individuals with severe mental disabilities., 63 Ohio St. L.J. 1729 (2002).

Jefferson D.E. Smith & Steve Calandrillo, Forward to fundamental alteration: addresing ADA Title III integration lawsuits after Olmstead v. L, 24 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 695 (2001).

Steven J. Snyder, Providing services to assisted living facility residents through home health agencies: meeting the need in changing times, 8 J. Affordable Housing & Commun. Dev. L. 159 (1999).

Mark C. Weber, HOME AND COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES, OLMSTEAD, AND POSITIVE RIGHTS: A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION, 39 Wake Forest Law Review Spring, 2004 269 (2004).

Loretta Williams, Note. Long term care after Olmstead v L.C.: wil the potential of the ADA's integration mandate be achieved? (Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring, 527 U>S> 581, 1999.), 17 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 205 (2000).

Lucille D. Wood, Note. Costs and the right to community-based treatment, 16 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 501 (1998).

Sandra L. Yue, A return to institutionalization despite Olmstead v. L.C.? The inadequancy of Medicaid provider reimbursement in Minnesota and the failure to deliver home-and community-based waiver services, 19 Law & Ineq. 307 (2001).

Crime

Comment. Communtation for the mentally retarded? (Atkins v. Virginia, 122 S. Ct. 2242, 2002.), 54 S.C. L. Rev. 809 (2003).

Shawn D. Anderson & Jay Hewitt, The effect of competency restoration training on defendants with mental retardation found not competent to proceed, 26 Law & Hum. Behav. 343 (2002).

Susan M. Boland, Walking the edge of death: an annotated bibliography on juveniles, the mentally ill, the mentally retarted and the death penalty., 21 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 1 131 (2001).

Richard J. Bonnie, Mentally ill prisoners on death row: unsoovled puzzles for courts and legislatures., 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 4 1169 (2005).

Richard J. Bonnie, THE DEATH PENALTY AND MENTAL ILLNESS: MENTALLY ILL PRISONERS ON DEATH ROW: UNSOLVED PUZZLES FOR COURTS AND LEGISLATURES, 54 Catholic University Law Review Summer, 2005 1169 (2005).

Aimee D. Borromeo, Comment. Mental retardation and the death penalty, 3 Loy. J. Pub. Int. L. 175 (2002).

Bette L. Bottoms, et al., Jurors' perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities., 27 Law & Hum. Behav. 205 (2003).

Mijha Butcher, Student article. Using mediation to remedy civil rights violations when the defendant is not an intentional perpetrator: the problems of unconscious disparate treatment and unjustified disparate impacts., 24 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 225 (2003).

Leslie Calhoun, Rethinking Juvenile Rehabilitation Techniques: How Failure to Modify Positive Peer Culture for Mentally Ill Youths Violates Title II of the ADA, 50 The Wayne Law Review Spring, 2004 201 (2004).

Morgan Cloud, et al., Words without meaning: the Constitution, confessions, and mentally retarded suspects, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev. 495 (2002).

Timothy Cone, Developintg the Eighth Amendment for those "least deserving" of punishment: statutory mandatory minimums for non-capital offenses can be "cruel and unusual" when imposed on mentally retarded offenders., 34 N.M. L.Rev 35 (2004).

Ronda Cress, J. Neil Grindstaff, S. Elizabeth Malloy, MENTAL CAPACITY AND THE DEATH PENALTY: ARTICLE: MENTAL HEALTH COURTS AND TITLE II OF THE ADA: ACCESSIBILITY TO STATE COURT SYSTEMS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES AND THE NEED FOR DIVERSION, 25 Saint Louis University Public Law Review 307 (2006).

Deborah W. Denno, Sexuality, rape and mental retardation, 1997 U. Ill. L. Rev. 315 (1997).

Richard C. Dieter, Introduction to presentations: the path to an eighth amendment analysis of mental illness and capital punishment., 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 4 1117 (2005).

Alexis Krulish Dowling, Comment. Post Atkins problems with enforcing the Supreme Court's ban on executing the mentally retarded. (Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 2002.), 33 Seton Hall L. Rev. 773 (2003).

Bryan Lester Dupler, The uncommon law: insanity, executions, and Oklahoma criminal procedure, 55 Okla. L. Rev. 1 (2002).

William J. Edwards, Capital punishment and mental disability: amici curiae brief in Penry v. Johnson, 12 Crim. L. F. 267 (2001).

Lucy C. Ferguson, THE IMPLICATIONS OF DEVELOPMENT COGNITIVE RESEARCH ON "EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCEY" AND THE IMPOSITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY ON JUVENILES, 54 American University Law Review 441 (2004).

Jennifer Fischer, The Americans with Disabilities Act: Correcting discrimination of persons with mental disabilities in the arrest, post-arrest, and pretrial processes., 23 Law & Ineq. 157 (2005).

Jennifer Fischer, The Americans with Disabilities Act: Correcting Discrimination of Persons with Mental Disabilities in the Arrest, Post-Arrest, and Pretrial Processes, 23 Law and Inequality Winter, 2005 157 (2005).

Ryken Grattet & Valerie Jenness, Examining the boundaries of hate crime law: disabilities and the "dilemma of difference", 91 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 653 (2001).

Timothy S. Hall, Legal fictions and moral reasoning: capital punishment and the mentally retarded defendant after Penry v. Johnson, 35 Akron L. Rev 327 (2002).

Jennifer Hodulik, Comment. The drug court model as a response to "Broken Windows" criminal justice for the homeless mentally ill, 91 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1073 (2001).

Ronald S. Honberg, The injustice of imposing death sentences on people with severe mental illness., 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 4 1153 (2005).

James D. Johnson, Note. Does the Americans with Disabilities Act apply to the conduct of law enforcement officers pursuant to arrests? A survey of (Gorman v. Bartch, 925 F. Supp. 653, W.D. Mo. 1996), 14 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 901 (1998).

Oliver Kaufman, Note. Is executing the mentally retarded constitutional? (Atkins v. Virginia, 2001 U.S. Lexis 5463, Oct 1, 2001.), 85 Marq. L. Rev. 579 (2001).

Daniel B. Kessler, Note. Capital punishment and the diagnosis of mental retardation. (Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 2002.), 43 Jurimetrics J. 415 (2003).

Tim Kollas, Note. Federal power, states' rights, individual rights: mentally disabled prisoners and the Supremen Court's new activism, 10 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 861 (2002).

Bill Lockyer & Taylor S. Carey, Symposium: Capital concerns: The death penality in america: Capital punishment and the mentally retarded: Implementing Atkins, 15 Stan. & L. & Pol'y Rev. 329 (2004).

Bill Lockyer and Taylor S. Carey, CAPITAL CONCERNS: THE DEATH PENALTY IN AMERICA: Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded: Implementing Atkins, 15 Stanford Law & Policy Review 15 (2004).

Jessie Manchester, Comment. Beyond accomodation: reconstructing the insanity defense to provide an adequate remedy for postpartum psychotic women., 93 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 713 (2003).

Alison J. Meyers, Comment. Mentally ill and mentally retarded defendants in Texas may get a chance at justice: recommendations to the Task Force created by Tex. S.B. 553, 77th Leg., R.S. (2001)., 43 S. Tex. L. Rev. 1233 (2002).

Christine Michalopoulos, Comment. Filling the holes of the insanity defense: the Andrea Yates case and the need for a new prong., 10 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 383 (2003).

Grant H. Morris, Placed in purgatory: conditional release of insanity acquittees, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 1061 (1997).

Joseph A. Nese, Jr., Comment. The fate of mentally retarded criminals: an examination of the propriety of their execution under the Eighth Amendment, 40 Duq. L. Rev. 373 (2002).

Erin O'Connor, Note. Is Kendra's Law a keeper? How Kendra's Law erodes fundamental rights of the mentally ill., 11 J.L. & Pol'y 313 (2002).

Lindsay Raphael, Comment. Have American standards of decency evolved to the point where capital punishment inflicted upon the mentally retarded can no longer be tolerated?, 26 Nova L. Rev. 269 (2001).

Margaret M. Severson, Moving beyond case law: suggestions for dealing with the mentally ill offender, 5 J. L. Soc. & Soc. Work 121 (1995).

Christopher Slobogin, Mental disorder as an exemption from the death penalty: the ABA-IRR task force recommendations, 54 Cath U. L. Rev. 4 1133 (2005).

Christopher Slobogin, Is Atkins the Antithesis or Apotheosis of AntiDiscrimination Principles?: Sorting Out the Groupwide Effects of Exempting People with Mental Retardation from the Death Penalty, 55 Alabama Law Review Summer, 2004 1101 (2004).

Christopher Slobogin, THE DEATH PENALTY AND MENTAL ILLNESS: MENTAL DISORDER AS AN EXEMPTION FROM THE DEATH PENALTY: THE ABA-IRR TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION, 54 Catholic University Law Review Summer, 2005 1133 (2005).

Ronald J. Tabak, Overview of task force proposal on mental disability and the death penalty., 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 4 1123 (2005).

Ronald J. Tabak, THE DEATH PENALTY AND MENTAL ILLNESS: OVERVIEW OF TASK FORCE PROPOSAL ON MENTAL DISABILITY AND THE DEATH PENALTY, 54 Catholic University Law Review Summer, 2005 1123 (2005).

Ronald J. Tabak, MENTAL CAPACITY AND THE DEATH PENALTY: ARTICLE: EXECUTING PEOPLE WITH MENTAL DISABILITES: HOW CAN WE MITIGATE AN AGGRAVATING SITUATION, 25 Saint Louis University Public Law Review 283 (2006).

Eli Velasquez, Casenote. The shaping of an American consensus against the execution of mentally retarded criminals ... (Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 2002.), 24 Whittier L. Rev. 955 (2003).

Sarah E. Wolf, Casenote. The mentally incompetent criminal defendant: United States v. Weston and the need for a guardian ad litem. (United States v. Weston, 255 F.3d 873, D.C. Cir. 2001. cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 670, U.S. 2001.), 10 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1071 (2002).

Defenses and Remedies

Katrina Atkins & Richard Bales, HIV and direct threat defense., 91 Ky. L.J. 859 (2002).

Katrina Atkins, Richard Bales, HIV and the Direct Threat Defense, 91 Kentucky Law Journal Summer 2002/2003 859 (2002).

Nathan J. Barber, Note. "Upside down and backwards": the ADA's direct threat defense and the meaning of a qualified individual after ... (Echazabal v. Chevron U.S.A., 226 F.3d 1063, 2000; cert. granted, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal, 122 S. Ct. 456, 2001.), 23 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 149 (2002).

Jennifer Wright Burke, Comment. American with Disabilities Act: an alleged violation of the ADA should not be a defense in a termination of parental rights proceeding, 29 U. Balt. L. Rev. 347 (2000).

Melissa M. Chureau, Comment. The Barnett paradox: Icarus's wings, 6 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L. 395 (2002).

Jennifer N. Coffin, Case note. Civil rights--Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Americans with Disabilities Act--HIV-infected health care workers and the "direct threat" defense. (Estate of Mauro v. Borgess Medical Center, 137 F. 3d 398, 6th Cir., cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 51, 1998, 66 Tenn. L. Rev. 311 (1998).

Ruth Colker, Winning and losing under the ADA, 62 Ohio St. L.J. 239 (2001).

Ruth Colker, The Americans with Disabilities Act: a windfall for defendants, 34 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 99 (1999).

Erin M. Conroy, Case comment. Labor and employment law--discrimination: an EEOC regulation allowing employers to assert that an employee may not pose a danger to himself falls within the purview of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal, 122 S. Ct. 2045, 2002.), 79 N.D. L. Rev. 147 (2003).

Patrick G. Coy & Timothy M. He, Disabilities and mediation readiness in court-referred cases: developing screening criteria and service networks, 16 Mediation Q. 113 (1998).

Sienna DeAgostino, Note. The decision's impact on the American with Disabilities Act. (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 79 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 281 (2002).

Mary L. Dispenza, Note. Overcoming a new digital divide; technology accommodations and the undue hardship defense under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 52 Syracuse L. Rev. 159 (2002).

Karen M. Doore, Note. Survival of the fittest? Waiting out the death of the plaintiff in ADA claims. (Allred v. Solaray, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 1394, D. Utah 1997, 1998 Utah L. Rev. 371 (1998).

Ryan Gill, Casenote. State immunity and the Americans with Disabilities Act after ... (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 74 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1239 (2003).

Jon L. Gillum, TORT LAW AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: ASSESSING THE NEED FOR A REALIGNMENT, 39 Idaho Law Review 531 (2003).

Dawn-Marie Harmon, HIV and the ADA: What is a Direct Threat?, 55 Maine Law Review 391 (2003).

Jill Elaine Hasday, Mitigation and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 2 217 (2004).

Geoffrey G. Hengerer, Comment. A return to state sovereignty: how individuals with disabilities in Maryland may still seek relief against state employers after.. (Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 2001.), 31 U. Balt. L. Rev. 67 (2001).

Ann Hubbard, Understanding and emplementing the ADA's direct threat defense, 95 NW. U. L. Rev. 4 1279 (2001).

Jessica L. Johnson, THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990: THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING LEGISLATION? A CLOSER LOOK AT CHEVRON V. ECHAZABAL AND THE EXPANSION OF THE DIRECT THREAT DEFENSE, 32 Capital University Law Review Spring,2004 761 (2004).

Tara Jones, Student article. The threat-to-self defense and the Americans with disabilities Act., 27 S. Ill. U. L.J. 539 (2003).

Adam B. Kaplan, Father Doesn't Always Know Best: Rejecting Paternalistic Expansion of the "Direct Threat" Defense to Claims Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, 106 Dickinson Law Review Fall, 2001 389 (2001).

J. J. Knauff, Dissing disabilities: a stundent's duty to mitigate maladies., 2001 BYU Educ. & L.J. 1 85 (2001).

Aaron Lacy, AM I MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: DISABILITIES, PATERNALISM, AND THREATS TO SELF, 44 Santa Clara Law Review 55 (2003).

Andrea Christensen Luby, Note. Estopping enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 13 J. L. & Pol. 415 (1997).

Jody Marcucci, Note. Foster children, AIDS, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the direct threat exception. (Doe v. County of Centre, 242 F.3d 437, 3d Cir. 2001.), 52 DePaul L. Rev. 945 (2003).

Armen H. Merjian, Bad decisions make bad decisions: Davis, Arline, and improper application of the undue financial burden defense under the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 65 Brooklyn L. Rev. 105 (1999).

Grant H. Morris, Symposium. Defining dangerousness: risking a dangerous definition, 10 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 61 (1999).

Sabra McDonald Owens, Note. Diagnostic evidence admissibility and the multiple personality disorder defense, 1 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 236 (1998).

Sabra McDonald Owens, Student article. The multiple personality disorder (MPD) defense, 8 Md. J. Contemp. Legal Issues 237 (1997).

Steven Plitt, Valerie J. Fasolo, & Daniel Maldonado, Article: Disability under a judicial microsope: The struggle to define the rights and remeddies for claims brought under the rehabilitation act, 47 N.Y. L. Sch. L. Rev. 269 (2003).

Brian S. Prestes, Student article. Disciplining the Americans with Disabilities Act's direct threat defense, 22 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 409 (2001).

Scott Quillin, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal: The Supreme Court's Common Sense Interpretation of the American's with Disabilities Act's Direct Threat Defense, 29 Oklahoma City University Law Review Summer, 2004 641 (2004).

Anne Rajotte, Asthma and Pesticides in Public Schools: Does the ADA Provide a Remedy Where Fifra Fails to Protect?, 31 Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 149 (2004).

Rebecca Roupe, AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 24 Journal of Juvenile Law 2003/2004 185 (2003).

Brian M. Saxe, WHEN A RIGID TEXTUALISM FAILS: DAMAGES FOR ADA EMPLOYMENT RETALIATION, 2006 Michigan State Law Review Summer, 2006 555 (2006).

James Schwellenbach, Comment. Mixed messages: an analysis of the conflicting standards used by the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals when awarding compensatory education for a voilation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 53 Me. L. Rev. 245 (2001).

Marney Collins Sims, Comment. Estop it! judicial estoppel and its use in Americans with Disabilities Act litigation, 34 Hous. L. Rev. 843 (1997).

Deborah L. Slowata, Quantifying a direct threat: risks that health care providers must take while treating infectious patients. (Bragdon v. Abbot, 524 U.S. 624, 1998), 20 Pace L. Rev. 569 (2000).

Sarah Starnes, Note. Psychiatric disabilities & the ADA: an analysis of conventional defenses & EEOC guidelines, 18 Rev. Litig. 181 (1999).

Robert L Strayer, III, Asserting the Seventh Amendment: an argument for the right to a jury trial when only back pay is sought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 795 (1999).

Sheehan Sullivan, Note. Employers beware: the Ninth Circuit's rejection of the "direct threat to self" disability discrimination defense in..(Echazabal v. Chevron, 226 F.3d 1063, 9th Cir. 2000, cert.granted, 2001 WL 267478, U.S. Oct.29,2001.), 25 Seattle U. L. Rev. 517 (2001).

Hilary Von Rohr, Recent development. Lactation litigation and the ADA solution: a response to Martinez v. NBC, 4 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 341 (2000).

Hilary Von Rohr, Recent development. Lactation litigation and the ADA solution: a response to Martinez v. NBC, 4 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 341 (2000).

Michael Wesley, Casenote. Title V, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the recovery of punitive damages thereunder. (Barnes v. Gorman, 122 S. Ct. 2097, 2002.), 27 S. Ill. U. L.J. 195 (2002).

Defining Disability/Major Life Activities

Sensitivity training: multiple chemical sensitivity and the ADA, 25 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 485 (0).

Thomas C. Abbott, KAPLAN AND "REGARDED AS": DOES THE ADA DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN REAL AND PERCEIVED DISABILITY?, 39 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review August, 2006 883 (2006).

Christiana M. Ajalat, Recent development. Is HIV really a "disability"?: The scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act after...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.), 22 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 751 (1999).

Erin Argo, Recent Decision. Employment law-Americans with Disabilities Act-corrective and mitigating measures shall be considered in determining whether individual is disabled under ADA, 69 Miss. L.J. 561 (1999).

Leonard J. Augustine, Jr., Note. Disabling the relationship between intentional discrimination and compensatory damages under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 66 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 592 (1998).

Stacie E. Barhorst, Note. What does disability mean: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 in the aftermath of Sutton, Murphy, and Albertsons, 48 Drake L. Rev. 137 (1999).

Erin K. Barta, Note. Practical effects of the Sutton decision: mitigation, deference, and the EEOC: (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2139, 2146, 1999.), 7 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 35 (2000).

Stephanie Beige, Note. The Supreme Court "substantially limits" the Americans with Disabilities Act: (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 u.S. 475, 1999, 16 Touro L. Rev. 1441 (2000).

Nora Belanger, Case note. The ADA--a practitioner's guide in the aftermath of..(Sutton v. United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471, 1999.), 21 Pace L. Rev. 271 (2000).

Lisa M. Benrud-Larson, Establishing a Substantial Limitation in Interacting with Others: A Call for Clearer Guidance from the EEOC, 90 Minnesota law Review June, 2006 1791 (2006).

Paula E. Berg, Ill/Legal: Interrogating the meaning and function of the category of disability in antidiscrimination law, 18 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 1 (1999).

Timothy Stewart Bland, The determination of disability under the ADA: should mitigating factors such as medications be considered?, 35 Idaho L. Rev. 265 (1999).

Mary Anne Bobinski, The expanding domain of the ADA: The Supreme Court's decision in Abbott v. Bragdon, 61 Tex. B.J. 918 (1998).

Jonathan Bridges, Note. Mitigating measures under the Americans with Disabilities Act: interpretation and deference in the judicial process, 74 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1061 (1999).

Jonathan Brown, Defining disability in 2001: a lower court odyssey, 23 Whittier L. Rev. 355 (2001).

Terri L. Bryson, Recent Developmentf: Public Employment: ADA, Disability Discrimination: Norton v. Leon County School Board, 2003 WL 21467095 (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. June 5, 2003), 33 Stetson L. Rev. 0 (0).

Terri L. Bryson, Recent development: Public employment: ADA, disability discrimination: Norton v. Leon County School Board, 2003 WL 21467095 (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. June 5, 2003), 33 Stetson L. Rev. 825 (2004).

Terri L. Bryson, PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT: ADA, DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION: Norton v. Leon County School Board, 2003 Wjl 21467195 (Fla. 2d Cir. Ct. June 5,2003), 33 Stetson Law Review Winter, 2004 825 (2004).

Robert L. Burgdorf, Jr., Symposium. "Substantially limited" protection from disability discrimination: the special treatment model and misconstructions of the definition of disability, 42 Vill. L. Rev. 409 (1997).

Carol R. Buxton, CIVIL RIGHTS: LOOKING BACK - LOOKING FORWARD: OBESITY AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 4 Barry Law Review Fall, 2003 109 (2003).

Jane Byeff Korn, Cancer and the ADA: rethinking disability, 74 Cal. L. Rev. 399 (2001).

Michael D. Carlis & Scott A. McCabe, Comment. Are there no per se disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act? the fate of asymptomatic HIV disease, 57 Md. L. Rev. 558 (1998).

Emily J. Carton, Comment. Lethal but not disable?--The Circuits split on ADA coverage of the asymptomatic HIV-positive victim, 103 Dick. L. Rev. 129 (1998).

Claudia Center & Andrew J. Imparato, Redefining "disability" discrimination: a proposal to restore civil rights protections for all workers., 14 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 321 (2003).

Claudia Center and Andrew J. Imparato, Symposium: Development in Disability Rights: Redefining "Disability" Discrimination: A Proposal to Restore Civil Rights Protections for All Workers, 14 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev 321 (2003).

Claudia Center and Andrew J. Imparato, Redefining "Disability" Discrimination: A Proposal to Restore Civil Rights Protections for All Workers, 14 Stanford Law & Policy Review 321 (2003).

Elizabeth C. Chambers, Note. Asymptomatic HIV as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 73 Wash. L. Rev. 403 (1998).

Elizabeth A. Chang, Note. Who should have it both ways?: The role of mitigating measures in an ADA analysis, 64 Brook. L. Rev. 1123 (1998).

Charles J. Coleman, Diane Cooney-Painter, and Sukhjit K. Moonga, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in the Workplace Under the ADA in the Wake of Sutton and Its Companions, 12 Employee Responsibilities ands Rights Journal 0 (2000).

Kevin L. Cope, Comment: Sutton misconstrued: Why the ADA should now permit employers to make their employees disabled, 98 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1753 (2004).

Carolyn V. Counce, Note. Corrective devices and nearsightedness under the ADA, 28 U. Mem. L. Rev. 1195 (1998).

Elizabeth A. Crawford, Comment. The courts' interpretations of a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act: are they keeping our promise to the disabled?, 35 Hous. L. Rev. 1207 (1998).

Maria Greco Danaher, INABILITY TO USE RIGHT HAND AND ARM IS NOT NECESSARILY A DISABILITY, 8 Lawyers Jounal November 24, 2006 3 (2006).

Christine Spinella Davis, Comment. Asymptomatic HIV under the ADA: the invisible, yet legitimate disability, 15 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 357 (1998).

Mark DeLoach, Can't We All Just Get Along?: The Treatment of "Interacting with Others" as a Major Life Activity in the Americans with Disabilities Act, 57 Vanderbilt Law Review May, 2004 1313 (2004).

Mark S. Dichter & Sarah E. Sutor, The new genetic age: do our genes make us disabled individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act?, 42 Vill. L. Rev. 613 (1997).

Matthew Diller, Dissonant disability policies: the tensions between the Americans with Disabilities Act and Federal Disability Benefit programs, 76 Tex. L. Rev. 1003 (1998).

Kelly Druten, Comment. The Family and Medical Leave Act: what is a serious health condition?, 46 U. Kan. L. Rev. 183 (1997).

Richard C. Dunn, Note. Determining the intended beneficiaries of the ADA in the aftermath of Sutton: limiting the application of the disabling corrections corollary, 43 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1265 (2002).

Curtis D. Edmonds, Snakes and ladders: expanding the definition of "major life activity" in the Americans with Disabilities Act, 33 Tex Tech L. Rev. 321 (2002).

Curtis D. Edmonds, SNAKES AND LADDERS: EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF "MAJOR LIFE ACTIVITY" IN THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 33 Texas Tech Law Review 321 (2002).

Lisa Eichhorn, Major litigation activities regarding major life activities: the failure of the "disability" definition in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 77 N.C. L. Rev 1405 (1999).

Stephanie A. Fishman, Note. Individuals with disabilities but without mitigating measures, 46 Wayne L. Rev. 2013 (2000).

Stephanie C. Flores, Note. Reading the ADA with 20/20 vision: anti-discrimination protection for individuals with corrective disabilities after..(Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 1999, 22 Whittier L. Rev. 909 (2001).

Michelle T. Friedland, Not disabled enough: the ADA's "major life activity" definition of disability, 52 Stanford L. Rev. 171 (1999).

Major Baucum Fulk, Bragdon v. Abbott: Current and Future Ramifications for Federal Employment Discrimination Law, 2006 Army Lawyer February, 2006 12 (2006).

John Gibeaut, Filling a need, 83 ABA J. 48 (1997).

Justin S. Gilbert, Prior History, Present Discrimination, and the ADA's "Record of" Disability, 31 The University of Memphis Law Review Spring, 2001 659 (2001).

Brian R. Gin, Genetic discrimination: Huntington's disease and The Americans with Disabilities Act, 97 Colum. L. Rev. 1406 (1997).

Leah Guidry, Note. To heal another or to protect oneself?: HIV under the ADA in light of Bragdon v. Abbott, 15 Touro L. Rev. 805 (1999).

Katherine Hsu Hagmann-Borenstein, MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING: HAS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S SUTTON DECISION THWARTED A FLOOD OF FRIVOLOUS LITIGATION?, 37 Connecticut Law Review Summer, 2005 1121 (2005).

Kristina M. Hall, Note. Enforcing equal protection rights by designating infertility as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Pacourek v. Inland Steel Co., Inc., 916 F. Supp. 797, N.D. Ill. 1996, 11 BYU J. Pub. L. 287 (1997).

Matthew C. Hans, Note. Lake v. Arnold: the disabled and the confused jurisprudence of 42 U.S.C. 1985(3), 15 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 673 (1999).

Erica Worth Harris, Controlled impairments under the Americans with Disabilities Act: a search for the meaning of disability, 73 Wash. L. Rev. 575 (1998).

Wendy F. Hensel, Interacting with others: a major life activity under the Americans with Disabilities Act?, 2002 Wis. L. Rev. 1139 (2002).

Thais Hernandez, An application of the Chevron doctrine to the EEOC's Interpretation of the ADA: why mitigating measures must be considered when evaluating a disability, 7 U. Miami Bus. L. Rev. 309 (1999).

Barbara Hoffman, Reports of its death were greatly exaggerated: the EEOC regulations that define "disability" under the ADA after Sutton v United Air Lines, 9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 253 (2000).

Sharona Hoffman, Paul Stevne Miller, Chai r. Feldblum, and Michael Stein, THE DEFINITION OF DISABILITY IN THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: ITS SUCCESSES AND SHORTCOMINGS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN LAW SCHOOLS SECTIONS ON EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW; LABOR RELATIONS AND EMPLOYMENT LAW; AND LAW, MEDICINE AND HEALTH CARE, 9 Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 473 (2005).

Sara Gagne Holmes, Case note. The Supreme Court reverses the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's directive that disability determinations should be made without regard to mitigating measures. (Sutton v United Airlines, 199 S. Ct. 2139, 1999.), 52 Me. L. Rev. 425 (2000).

Jeremy Holt, Reasonable Accommodation: who should bear the burden?, 28 Stetson L. Rev. 1229 (1999).

Kari Horner, A GROWING PROBLEM: WHY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO SHOULDER THE BURDEN IN PROTECTING WORKERS FROM WEIGHT DISCRIMINATION, 54 Catholic University Law Review Winter, 2005 589 (2005).

Kimberly Horvath, Does Bragdon v. Abbott provide the missing link for infertile couples seeking protection under the ADA?, 2 DePaul J. Health Care L. 819 (1999).

Ann Hubbard, The myth of independance and the major life activity of caring., 8 J. Gender Race & Just. 2 327 (2004).

Ann Hubbard, THE MAJOR LIFE ACTIVITY OF BELONGING, 39 Wake Forest Law Review Spring, 2004 217 (2004).

Ann Hubbard, Meaningful Lives and Major Life Activities, 55 Alabama Law Review Summer, 2004 997 (2004).

Timothy D. Johnston, Note. Reproduction is not a major life activity: implications for HIV infection as per se disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 85 Cornell L. Rev. 189 (1999).

Molly M. Joyce, Note. Has the Americans with Disabilities Act fallen on deaf ears? A post-Sutton analysis of mitigating measures in the Seventh Circuit., 77 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1389 (2002).

Michelle Kaemmerling, Note. ADA protection for individuals with asymptomatic HIV: (Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998, 77 N.C. L. Rev. 1266 (1999).

Sheryl Rebecca Kamholz, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act: advocating judicial deference to the EEOC's mitigating measures guidelines, 8 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 99 (1998).

Deborah Kaplan, The definition of disability: perspective of the disability community, 3 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 352 (2000).

Jennifer Hotchkiss Kaplan, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW- Navarro v. Pfizer Corporation: Too Much Disregard and Too Little Deference in Defining "Disability" Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 25 Western New England Law Review 263 (2003).

Jane M. Keenan, A Social Security claimant's statement that she is disabled and unable to work does not necessrily preclude a subsequent ADA wrongful termination claim. (Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corporation, 119 S. Ct. 1597, 1999), 38 Duq. L. Rev. 685 (2000).

Rebecca Kesler, Note. Running in circles: defining mental illness and dangerousness in the wake of Kansas v. Hendricks, 44 Wayne L. Rev. 1871 (1999).

Reteb M. Khasawneh, Note. Limiting the protections available to disabled individuals under the ADA: (Sutton v. United Airlines, Inc., 130 F.3d 893, 10th Cir. 1997.), 29 Cap. U. L. Rev. 761 (2002).

Amy M. Kimmel, Note. Insulin: can't be disabled with it--can't live without it, 52 Hastings L.J 749 (2001).

Michelle R. King & Beth S. Herr, The consequences and implications of a case-by-case analysis under the Americans with Disabilities Act for asymptomatic HIV-positive gay men and lesbians post Bragdon, 8 L. & Sexuality 531 (1998).

Jane Byeff Korn, Fat, explores whether obesity should be considered a disability under ADA, 77 B.U. L. Rev. 25 (1997).

Barbara L. Kramer, Hayes and Mobley: bridging the definition of disability under the Ohio Worker's Compensation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 45 Clev. St. L. Rev. 733 (1997).

Todd Lebowitz, Note. Evaluating purely reproductive disorders under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 96 Mich. L. Rev. 724 (1997).

Carolee Kvoriak Lezuch, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act: redefining "major life activity" to protect the mentally disabled, 44 Wayne L. Rev. 1839 (1999).

William B. Lovett, Jr., Note. Supreme Court's clarification of the effect of "mitigating measures" in disability determinations muddies disabilities water. (Sutton v. United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 1999.), 21 Miss. C.L. Rev. 153 (2001).

Richard A. Maniskas, Bragdon v. Abbott: the case in which reproduction was ruled to be a major life activity under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 10 Widener J. Pub. L. 187 (2001).

Richard A. Maniskas, BRAGDON V. ABBOTT: THE CASE IN WHICH REPRODUCTION WAS RULED TO BE A MAJOR LIFE ACTIVITY UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990, 10 Widener Journal of Public Law 187 (2001).

Michael T. Mann, Casenote. Defining a "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act--corrective measures as a factor. (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2139, 1999.), 69 U. Cin. L. Rev. 385 (2000).

Samuel A. Marcosson, Article: Of square pegs and round holes: the supreme court's ongoing "title VII-ization" of the Americans with Disabilities Act., 8 J. Gender Race & Just. 361 (2004).

Robert C. Mathes, Case note. Civil rights--the status of persons infected with asymptomatic HIV under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 after Bragdon: did the Supreme Court miss an opportunity to protect disabled Americans? (Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 1196, 1998, 34 Land & Water L. Rev. 237 (1999).

Connie Mayer, Is HIV a disability under the Americans withDisabilities Act: Unanswered questions after Bragdon v. Abbott, 14 J.L. & Health 179 (1999).

William J. McDevitt, Defining the term "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 10 St. Thomas L. Rev. 281 (1998).

Margaret C. McGrath, Comment: Insulin-dependent diabetes and access to treatment in the workplace: the failure of the americans with disabilities act to provide protection, 37 J. MarshallL. Rev. 957 (2004).

Daniel A. McMillan, Playing with work: Must "work" be treated as a "major life activity" for purposes of Americans with Disabilities Act?, XXXI Fordham Urb. L. Rev. 6 1333 (2004).

Daniel A. McMillan, Note, Playing with Work: Must "Work" Be Treated as a "Major Life Activity" for Purposes of the Americans with Disabilities Act?, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1333 (2004).

Catherine Meriano, Casenote. Disability defined as the burden shifts: (Cleveland v. Poly Management systems Corp., 526 U.S. 795, 1999.), 20 QLR 323 (2000).

Jason M. Metnick, EVOLVING TO ASYMPTOMATIC HIV AS A DISABILITY PER SE: CLOSING THE LOOPHOLE IN JUDICIAL PRECEDENT, 7 DePaul Journal of Health Care Law Fall, 2003 69 (2003).

Jessica Meyer, Obesity Harassment in School: Simply "Teasing" Our Way to Unfettered Obesity Discrimination and Stripping Away the Right to Education, 23 Law and Inequality Summer, 2005 429 (2005).

Michael P. Milton, Note. Should drug and alcohol addictions be compensable disabilities under the NFL Player Retirement Plan? An analysis of the Sweeney case. (Sweeney v. Bert Bell/NFL Player Retirement Plan, 961 F. Supp. 1381, S.D. Cal. 1997, 5 Sports Law. J. 205 (1998).

Jonathan R. Mook, Perspective-Bragdon v. Abbott - pushing the envelope on the definition of "disability.", 1/1/98 Benefits L.J. 715 (1998).

Katie Cook Morgan, Comment. Should infertility be a covered disability under the ADA?: a question for Congress, not the courts, 65 U. Cin. L. Rev. 963 (1997).

Andrea Kloehn Naef, Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams: A Case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Weakens the Grip of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 31 Pepperdine Law Review 575 (2004).

Charles Ngwena, DECONSTRUCTING THE DEFINITION OF 'DISABILITY' UNDER THE EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT: SOCIAL DECONSTRUCTION, 22 South African Journal of Human Rights 613 (2006).

Christine Neylon O'Brien, To tell the truth: should judical estoppel preclude Americans with Disabilities Act complaints?, 73 St. John's L. Rev. 349 (1999).

Sarah Lynn Oquist, Casenote. Reproduction constitutes a "major life activity" under the ADA: implications of the Supreme Court's decision in...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.), 32 Creighton L. Rev 1357 (1999).

Beth Hensley Orwick, Note. "Bartender, I'll have a beer and a disability"; alcoholism and the Americans with Disabilities Act: affirming the inmportance of the individualized inquiry in determining the definition of disability, 20 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 195 (2001).

Ashley L. Pack, Note. The Americans with Disabilites Act after Sutton v. UnitedAir Lines--can it live up to its promise of freedom for disabled Americans? (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 1999.), 89 Ky. L.J. 539 (2001).

Wendy E. Parmet, Individual rights and class discrimination: the fallacy of an individualized deternmination of disability, 9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 283 (2000).

Nora Q. E. Passamaneck, Note. Diverging paths from a shared origin: defining "disability" under 151B and the american with Disabilities Act in Dahill and Sutton., 82 B.U. L. Rev. 1263 (2002).

Todd Pauls, Asymptomatic HIV, reproduction, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: the disability dilemma in Bragdon v. Abbott, 22 Hamline L. Rev. 633 (1999).

Michael J.Puma, Note. Respecting the plain language of the ADA: a textualist argument rejecting the EEOC's analysis of controlled disabilities, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 123 (1998).

Mark C. Rahdert, Arline's ghost: some notes on working as a major life activity under the ADA, 9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 303 (2000).

Adele Rapport, PROVIDING DISABILITY STATUS: IT CAN BE DONE, 2 2006 ATLA Annual Convention Reference Materials 1637 (2006).

Frank S. Ravitch & Marsha B. Freeman, The Americans with "certain" Disabilities Act: Title I of the ADA and the Supreme Court's result oriented jurisprudence, 77 Denv. U.L. Rev. 199 (1999).

Jamie C. Ray & Stephen S. Pennington, The substantial limitation approach to defining disability: why does it create an insurmountable barrier to individuals who are regarded as disabled?, 9 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 333 (2000).

Amy C. Reeder, Casenote. Is asymptomatic HIV a per se disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act? (Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998.), 50 Mercer L. Rev. 631 (1999).

Michael D. Reisman, TRAVELING "TO THE FARTHEST REACHES OF THE ADA," OR TAKING AIM AT EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF PERCEIVED DISABILITY?, 26 Cardozo Law Review April,2005 2121 (2005).

Patrick Rogers, Challenges in Meeting the Disability Qualification Under the ADA: The Tenth Circuit's Analysis in Mason v. Avaya Communications, Inc., 82 Denver University Law Review 539 (2005).

Lawrence D. Rosenthal, Can't Stomach the Amercians with Disabilities Act? How the Federal Courts Have Gutted Disability Discrimination Legislation in Cases Involving Individuals with Gastrointestinal Disorders and Other Hidden Illnesses, 53 Catholic University Law Review Winter,2004 449 (2004).

Mark A. Rothsein, Serge A. Martinez, W. Paul McKinney, USING ESTABLISHED MEDICAL CRITERIA TO DEFINE DISABILITY: A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 80 Washington University Law Quarterly Spring, 2002 243 (2002).

Mark A. Rothstein, et al., Using established medical criteria to define disability: a proposal to amend the Americans with Disabilities Act, 80 Wash. U. L.Q. 243 (2002).

Gary L. Ruckelshaus, Casenote. Fourteenth Amendment & 42 U.S.C. section 12182 (Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998, 9 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 241 (1998).

Reed L. Russell, Comment. Arguing for more principled decision making in deciding whether an individual is substantially limited in the major life activity of working under the ADA, 47 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1057 (1998).

Peter K. Rydel, Redefining the right to reproduce: asserting infertility as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 63 Albany L. Rev. 593 (1999).

Allison A. Satchwill, Casenote. Asymptomatic HIV and the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Runnebaum v. Nationsbank of Maryland, N.A., 123 F.3d 156, 4th Cir. 1997, 66 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1387 (1998).

Shorge Sato, Note. A little bit disabled: intertility and the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Saks v. Franklin Covey, 119 F. Supp. 2d 318, S.D.N.Y. 200, 5 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 189 (2001).

Theresa A. Schneider, Note. Stretching the limits of the ADA: asymptomatic HIV-positive status as a disability in...(Bragdon v. Abbott, 118 S. Ct. 2196, 1998, 77 Neb. L. Rev. 206 (1998).

Kathleen M. Sheil, Note. The Americans with Disabilities Act: are your wrists protected?, 23 J. Corp. L. 325 (1998).

William Brent Shellhorse, Note. The untenable stricture: pre-mitigation measurement serves to deny protection under the American with Disabilities Act, 4 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 177 (1998).

Thomas Simmons, The ADA prima facie plaintiff: a critical overview of Eighth Circuit Case Law, 47 Drake L. Rev. 761 (1999).

Thomas Simmons, "Working" with the ADA's "Regarded as" definition of a disability, 5 Tex. Forum Civ. Liberties & Civ. Rights 81 (2000).

Anupa Soni-Gohel, Note. Asymptomatic HIV finds no refuge in the Fourth Circuit's workplace. (Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Maryland, 123 F.3d 156, 4th Cir. 1997.), 8 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 243 (1998).

Anupa Soni-Gohel, Notes: Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Maryland: asymptomatic HIV finds no refuge in the Fourth Circuit's workplace, 8 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 243 (1998).

Bryan P. Stephenson, I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry... But Could I Sue?: Whether "Interacting With Other's Is a Major Life Activity Under the ADA, 31 Pepperdine Law Review 773 (2004).

Emily J. Swiatocha, Case Comment, Disability Rights Law - Occupation - Specific Physical Impairments May Not Qualify Employees for Protection Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 36 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 585 (2003).

Andrew C. Testerman, Comment. The Supreme Court applies "corrective" and "mitigating" common sense to the ADA. (Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 199 S. Ct. 2139, 1999.), 77 Denv. U. L. Rev. 165 (1999).

Stephen B. Thomas, Valerie Riedthaler, GENDER IDENTITY DISORDER, COLLEGES, & FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT LAW, 212 West's Education Law Reporter November 2, 2006 575 (2006).

Christine M. Tomko, Note. The economically disadvantaged and the ADA: why economic need should factor into the mitigating measures disability analysis, 52 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1033 (2002).

Bonnie Poitras Tucker, Symposium. The Supreme Court's definition of disability under the ADA: a return to the Dark Ages, 52 Ala. L. Rev. 321 (2000).

Amanda L. Van, INTOLERABLE UNCERTAINTY: AN EXAMINATION OF THE INCONSISTENT TREATMENT OF FIBROMYALGIA UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 27 Thomas Jefferson Law Review Spring, 2005 421 (2005).

Amanda G. Wachuta, THE ADA GETS EVEN MORE COMPLICATED: ANALYZING PREGNANCY WITH COMPLICATIONS AS A DISABILITY, 52 Drake Law Review Spring, 2004 471 (2004).

Maureen R. Walsh, Note. What constitutes a "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act: should court consider mitigating measures?, 55 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 917 (1998).</