ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
I. Standards of Academic Performance
A. Minimum Standard for Graduation
and Good Standing
No student may be awarded
a J.D. degree who does not, at the time of the awarding of the degree,
have at least a 2.0 cumulative grade point average on law school work
according to the grading system utilized within the law school.
The minimum standard of academic performance while in the law school is
1.90. Any student whose cumulative grade point average falls below that
minimum for work on law studies is not in good standing and subject to
academic exclusion according to the procedures herein.
B. Standards of Performance
for First-year Students
Any student whose first-year
grade point average at the end of the first year of law school is under
1.58 shall be dismissed from school with no right to petition for readmission.
Any student whose grade point average at the end of the first year is at
least 1.58 but less than 1.90 shall be placed on probation and required
to repeat all of the first year courses. The student may choose to
repeat the first year courses immediately or may remain out of school for
one academic year and then repeat the first year courses. The student
will have only one opportunity to successfully repeat the first year courses
with a grade point average of at least 1.90. Upon successful completion
of the first-year courses with a grade point average of at least 1.90,
the grades from the initial attempt at the first year shall be expunged
from the student's record and not included in calculating the student's
grade point average.
C. Standards of Performance
for 2nd and 3rd year Students
1. A student whose
cumulative GPA after the first two semesters is above 1.90 is in good standing.
2. If at any time
after the first two semesters a student's cumulative GPA falls below 1.90,
the student will be so notified by mail that he or she will be excluded
from the class in the next academic semester unless regularly readmitted
as herein provided. That notice shall be entered in the student's academic
record.
3. Upon receipt of
the notice, the student may complete the semester then enrolled. However,
the student will not be allowed to enroll in the next semester following
the receipt of notice of exclusion unless that student is readmitted as
herein provided.
4. That the student
is enrolled in or has completed work which may, when the grades are received,
increase the grade average above 1.90 does not dispense with the necessity
to seek readmission, nor will such actual or potential grades guarantee
readmission.
5. Any student
readmitted under this provision will be on academic probation for the first
semester of attendance after readmission. During that semester, the
student must raise his/her cumulative grade point average to 1.90.
Failure to do so will result in permanent academic exclusion from the law
school, unless an exception is made by the readmissions committee either
at the conclusion of that semester or at some later time.
II. READMISSION STANDARDS
A. In resolving the merits
of an application for readmission, the applicant has the burden of justifying
readmission by establishing each of the following criteria:
1. The applicant must
present and document specific unusual or unique circumstances, not common
to a large number of students or inherent in the academic process, which
reasonably could produce inferior academic performance.
a. The following are
illustrative of specific unique circumstances: serious illness or injury
to the applicant or death, serious illness, or injury to a member of the
applicant's family; unusual and unanticipated financial developments; serious
personal problems such as divorce.
b. The following are
typical examples of vague, non-unique circumstances which will not justify
readmission: difficulty of law school work, poor or unsuccessful study
habits, lack of emotional maturity, financial worries, social relationship
problems, lack of total commitment to the profession.
c. Risks willingly
assumed, such as part-time work,
that could and did disrupt the applicant's work and study habits will not
disqualify an applicant for readmission, but will militate against readmission.
B. The applicant must
present evidence establishing that the unique circumstances did, in fact,
contribute to the poor performance.
Post hoc rationalizations
will not justify readmission.
C. The applicant should
present evidence that there are excellent prospects for satisfactory performance
in the future.
III. READMISSION PROCEDURES
A. Applications
All requests for readmission
shall be made to the dean. Requests must be made in writing
and mailed within 15 days from the dean's mailing of the notice of academic
exclusion, or no later than 60 days prior to the scheduled first day of
classes for which the student desires to be readmitted. The request for
readmission generally must set forth evidence suggesting satisfaction of
the readmission standards found in II. Specifically, the application shall
contain:
1. Law school academic
record and history of applicant.
2. Perceived reasons
why performance was unsatisfactory.
3. Evidence that the
reasons for unsatisfactory performance have been removed.
4. Evidence that the
applicant can perform in a competent manner for the balance of his/her
law school career.
5. Evidence of academic
accomplishment or potential not reflected in the law school record, e.g.,
graduate school, relevant work record, letters of recommendation, etc.
6. Courses in which
applicant plans to enroll if readmitted.
7. Proposals to remedy
past defects and improve future performance.
8. Any past petitions
for readmission and action thereon.
B. Committee Procedures
The following procedures
shall be followed by any committee charged by the dean with readmission decisions.
1. All applicants who have a right to petition for readmission
shall, upon request, be given a personal hearing.
2. The personal appearance
shall not substitute for or excuse the complete written application. The
hearing will be informal. The applicant should briefly outline points not
made in the application, present any written or oral evidence supporting
his or her application and be willing to answer any questions or supply
any information requested by the committee.
3. The applicant may
be represented by a person or attorney of his choice, but the hearing will
be closed to any other person not on the committee.
4. The committee will
debate the application outside the presence of the applicant and vote by
secret ballot. Readmission will be granted only by affirmative vote of
a majority of the members present.
5. Applicant will
be informed in writing of the committee action within three days following
the hearing. The applicant cannot expect to be informed of the committee
action personally on the day of the hearing.
C. In resolution of
readmission requests, the standards set forth in Part II will be followed
and consistently applied.
|