|
Featured Acquisitions - August
2005

|
|
Good Courts: The Case for Problem-Solving Justice by Greg Berman and John Feinblatt
New York : New Press : Distributed by W.W. Norton, 2005
KF9223 .B47 2005 Balcony
Public confidence in American
criminal courts is at an all-time low. Victims, communities, and even
offenders view courts as unable to respond adequately to complex social
and legal problems including drugs, prostitution, domestic violence,
and quality-of-life crime. Even many judges and attorneys think that
the courts produce assembly-line justice.
Increasingly embraced by even the most
hard-on-crime jurists, problem-solving courts offer an effective
alternative. As documented by Greg Berman and John Feinblatt — both of
whom were instrumental in setting up New York's Midtown Community Court
and Red Hook Community Justice Center, two of the nation's premier
models for problem-solving justice — these alternative courts
re-engineer the way everyday crime is addressed by focusing on the
underlying problems that bring people into the criminal justice system
to begin with.
The first book to describe this cutting-edge movement in detail, Good Courts,
an in-depth look at Oregon’s Portland Community Court and reviews the
growing body of evidence that the problem-solving approach to justice
is indeed producing positive results around the country.
|
 |
|
Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar
by John P. Heinz, et al.
Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2005
KF298 .U73 2005 Balcony
Over the past several decades, the number of lawyers in large cities
has doubled, women have entered the bar at an unprecedented rate, and
the scale of firms has greatly expanded. This immense growth has
transformed the nature and social structure of the legal profession. In
the most comprehensive analysis of the urban bar to date, Urban Lawyers presents a compelling portrait of how these changes continue to shape the field of law today.
Drawing
on extensive interviews with Chicago lawyers, the authors demonstrate
how developments in the profession have affected virtually every aspect
of the work and careers of urban lawyers-their relationships with
clients, job tenure and satisfaction, income, social and political
values, networks of professional connections, and patterns of
participation in the broader community. Yet despite the dramatic
changes, much remains the same. Stratification of income and power
based on gender, race, and religious background, for instance, still
maintains inequality within the bar.
The authors of Urban Lawyers
conclude that organizational priorities will likely determine the
future direction of the legal profession. And with this landmark study
as their guide, readers will be able to make their own informed
predictions.
|
 |
|
God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law by Marci A. Hamilton
New York : Cambridge University Press, 2005
KF9434 .H36 2005 Balcony
God vs. the Gavel challenges the pervasive assumption that all
religious conduct deserves constitutional protection. While religious
conduct provides many benefits to society, it is not always benign. The
thesis of the book is that anyone who harms another person should be
governed by the laws that govern everyone else - and truth be told,
religion is capable of great harm.
This may not sound like a radical
proposition, but it has been under assault since the 1960s. The
majority of academics and many religious organisations would construct
a fortress around religious conduct that would make it extremely
difficult to prosecute child abuse by clergy, medical neglect of
children by faith-healers, and other socially unacceptable behaviours.
This book intends to change the course of the public debate over
religion by bringing to the public’s attention the tactics of religious
entities to avoid the law and therefore harm others.
|
 |
|
Optional Law: The Structure of Legal Entitlements
by Ian Ayres
Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2005
K487.E3 A997 2005 Balcony
Spurred by the advances in option theory that have been remaking
financial and economic scholarship over the past thirty years, a
revolution is taking shape in the way legal scholars conceptualize
property and the way it is protected by the law. Ian Ayres's Optional Law explores how option theory is overthrowing many accepted wisdoms and producing tangible new tools for courts in deciding cases.
Ayres identifies flaws in the current system and shows how option
theory can radically expand and improve the ways that lawmakers
structure legal entitlements. An option-based system, Ayres shows,
gives parties the option to purchase--or the option to sell--the
relevant legal entitlement. Choosing to exercise a legal option forces
decisionmakers to reveal information about their own valuation of the
entitlement. And, as with auctions, entitlements in option-based law
naturally flow to those who value them the most. Seeing legal
entitlements through this lens suggests a variety of new entitlement
structures from which lawmakers might choose. Optional Law provides a theory for determining which structure is likely to be most effective in harnessing parties' private information.
Proposing a practical approach to the foundational question of how to allocate and protect legal rights, Optional Law
will be applauded by legal scholars and professionals who continue to
seek new and better ways of fostering both equitable and efficient
legal rules. |
 |
|
Legal Aspects of Implementing the Kyoto Protocol Mechanisms: Making Kyoto Work edited by David Freestone and Charlotte Streck
Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2005
K3593.A41992 Z4 2005 Balcony
The first protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC) was adopted in Kyoto in 1997. It is a unique international law
instrument which sets stringent, legally binding targets for the
reduction of emissions of the "greenhouse gases" (primarily carbon
dioxide) which contribute to climate change. The targets are
unprecedented in an environmental agreement and will involve
substantial financial commitment in virtually all industrialized
countries. This is also the first international agreement to include
"economic instruments" to assist parties to meet the targets. These
economic instruments, known as the "Kyoto Mechanisms" or the
"flexibility mechanisms" are joint implementation, the Clean
Development Mechanism, and emissions trading.
The Kyoto Protocol defined these mechanisms, but did not set out the
details necessary for their operation. After protracted negotiations,
detailed rules were finalized at the Seventh Session of the UNFCCC
Conference of Parties in Marrakech. The 'Marrakech Accords' run to
almost 250 pages, but still leave many important practical issues
unaddressed. As the Executive Board of the Clean Development Mechanism
begins to operate and more and more projects are developed to take
advantage of the Kyoto Mechanisms, the key issues and problems are now
becoming more apparent.
Drawing on the emerging body of expertise in this complex area, this
book conveys a knowledge of what is becoming known as 'Carbon Finance'.
It thereby aims to contribute to the development of the market for
carbon emission reductions - one of the objectives of the Kyoto
mechanisms. |
 |
|
Interpreting State Constitutions: A Jurisprudence of Function in a Federal System
by James A. Gardner
Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2005
KF4552 .G37 2005 Basement
Interpreting State Constitutions examines and proposes a solution
to a problem central to contemporary debates over the enforcement of
civil liberties: how courts, government officials, and lawyers should
go about interpreting the constitutions of the American states.
With
the Supreme Court's retreat from the aggressive protection of
individual rights, state courts have begun to interpret state
constitutions to provide broader protection of liberties. This
development has reversed the polarity of constitutional politics, as
liberals advocate unimpeded state power while conservatives lobby for
state subordination to a constitutional law controlled centrally by the
Supreme Court.
James A. Gardner here lays out the first fully
developed theory of subnational constitutional interpretation. He
argues that states are integral components of a national system of
overlapping and mutually checking authority and that the purpose of
this system is to protect liberty and defend against federal
domination. The resulting account provides valuable prescriptive advice
to state courts, showing them how to fulfill their responsibilities to
the federal system in a way that strengthens American constitutional
discourse.
|
 |
|
The Impossibility of Religious Freedom by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan
Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c2005
KF228.W353 S85 2005 Balcony
The Constitution may guarantee it. But religious freedom in America
is, in fact, impossible. So argues this timely and iconoclastic work by
law and religion scholar Winnifred Sullivan. Sullivan uses as the
backdrop for the book the trial of Warner vs. Boca Raton, a recent case
concerning the laws that protect the free exercise of religion in
America. The trial, for which the author served as an expert witness,
concerned regulations banning certain memorials from a
multiconfessional nondenominational cemetery in Boca Raton, Florida.
The book portrays the unsuccessful struggle of Catholic, Protestant,
and Jewish families in Boca Raton to preserve the practice of placing
such religious artifacts as crosses and stars of David on the graves of
the city-owned burial ground.
Sullivan demonstrates how, during
the course of the proceeding, citizens from all walks of life and
religious backgrounds were harassed to define just what their religion
is. She argues that their plight points up a shocking truth: religion
cannot be coherently defined for the purposes of American law, because
everyone has different definitions of what religion is. Indeed, while
religious freedom as a political idea was arguably once a force for
tolerance, it has now become a force for intolerance, she maintains.
A clear-eyed look at the laws created to protect religious freedom,
this vigorously argued book offers a new take on a right deemed by many
to be necessary for a free democratic society. It will have broad
appeal not only for religion scholars, but also for anyone interested
in law and the Constitution.
|
 |
|
Becoming Justice Blackmun: Harry Blackmun's Supreme Court Journey
by Linda Greenhouse
New York : Times Books : H. Holt and Co., c2005
KF8745.B555 G74 2005 Balcony
From 1970 to 1994, Justice Harry A. Blackmun (1908-1999) wrote numerous
landmark Supreme Court decisions, including Roe v. Wade, and
participated in the most contentious debates of his era-all behind
closed doors. In Becoming Justice Blackmun, Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times draws back the curtain on America's most
private branch of government and reveals the backstage story of the
Supreme Court through the eyes and writings of this extraordinary
justice.
Greenhouse was the
first print reporter to have access to Blackmun's extensive archive and
his private and public papers. From this trove she has crafted a
compelling narrative of Blackmun's years on the Court, showing how he
never lost sight of the human beings behind the legal cases and how he
was not afraid to question his own views on such controversial issues
as abortion, the death penalty, and sex discrimination. Greenhouse also
tells the story of how Blackmun's lifelong friendship with Chief
Justice Warren E. Burger withered in the crucible of life on the
nation's highest court, revealing how political differences became
personal, even for the country's most respected jurists.
Becoming Justice Blackmun,
written by America's preeminent Supreme Court reporter, offers a rare
and wonderfully vivid portrait of the nation's highest court, including
insights into many of the current justices. It is a must-read for
everyone who cares about the Court and its impact on our lives.
draws back the curtain on America's most private branch of government
and reveals the backstage story of the Supreme Court through the eyes
and writings of this extraordinary justice. |
 |
|
To Provide for the General Welfare: A History of the Federal Spending Power
by Theodore Sky
Newark [Del.] : University of Delaware Press ; London : Associated University Presses, c2003
KF4629 .S58 2003 Balcony
The framers of the United States Constitution gave Congress the power
to tax in order to provide for the "general welfare of the United
States." This book traces the constitutional controversy to which that
power gave rise and its role in fueling a massive expansion in federal
activity and authority. Early chapters consider the framing of the
power and the battle between Hamilton and Madison over its scope. The
book then examines the contribution of the presidencies of Jefferson,
Madison, Monroe, John Quincy Adams, Jackson, and Lincoln, as well as
the Reconstruction, Theodore Roosevelt, and Wilson eras, to the
resolution that paved the way for the definitive Supreme Court
decisions of the New Deal period. The work updates this account with a
perspective on the influence of the postwar twentieth-century
presidents in shaping the modern exercise of the spending power. It
speculates as well on a possible nexus between the spending power
evolution and contemporary scholarship on transforming constitutional
change. In this way the book documents how Americans came to read their
Constitution
to help them better their roads, schools, cultural institutions, and
health care to provide themselves with social insurance and safety net
programs for times of need. The book will contribute to a better
understanding of the critically important spending power and its
potential in helping us confront twenty-first century challenges.
|
 |
|
The Abolition of Antitrust edited by Gary Hull
New Brunswick, N.J. : Transaction Publishers, c2005
KF1649 .A71 2005 Balcony
The Abolition of Antitrust asserts that antitrust laws—on
economic, legal, and moral grounds—are bad, and provides convincing
evidence supporting arguments for their total abolition. Every year,
new antitrust prosecutions arise in the U.S. courts; Gary Hull and the
contributing authors look at some of these cases—as well as the very
Antitrust Act itself—and conclude that they are based on an erroneous
interpretation of the history of American business, premised on bad
economics. For Hull, antitrust prosecutions are based on a horrible
moral inversion: that it is acceptable to sacrifice America’s best
producers.
The contributors explain how key antitrust ideas, for instance,
“monopoly,” “restraint of trade,” and “anticompetitive behavior,” have
been used to justify prosecution, and then make clear why those ideas
are false. They sketch the historical, legal, economic, and moral
reasoning that gave rise to the passage and growth of antitrust
legislation.
This dynamic and accessible work, now available in paperback, is not
simply a polemical argument for a particular policy position. On
publication, Adam Mossof at Michigan State University commented, “The
essays in this book present a sustained economic, historical, moral,
and legal broadside against the various federal statutes known as
antitrust doctrine. They explode the cherished myths underlying the
antitrust laws, and expose their intellectual fountainhead in a
morality of self-sacrifice that is incompatible with individual rights,
free enterprise, and objective law. With the publication of this text,
businessmen, lawyers, economists, policymakers, legislators, and judges
finally have access to a systemic critique of the antitrust laws. From
here on, if antitrust continues to violate the rights of businessmen
and to ravage the American economy, it is not for lack of knowing how
and why.” |
 |
|
Executed on a Technicality: Lethal Injustice on America's Death Row
by David R. Dow
Boston : Beacon Press, c2005
KF9227.C2 D69 2005 Balcony
The story of the death row inmates who changed one
Texas lawyer’s mind about capital punishment
When David Dow took his first capital case, he supported the death
penalty. He changed his position as the men on death row became
real people to him, as he came to witness the profound injustices
they endured: from coerced confessions to disconcertingly incompetent
lawyers; from racist juries and backward judges to a highly arbitrary
death penalty system.
Dow’s eye-opening book is captivating because he allows the men,
and their cases, to speak for themselves. For instance, one inmate’s
lawyer literally slept through his trial; another inmate was executed
because the jury never heard from two eyewitnesses who swore he
was no the murderer; and yet another inmate was allowed to represent
himself at trial despite the fact that his mental imbalance, which
included attempts to issue a subpoena to Jesus Christ, was evident.
It is these concrete accounts of the people Dow has known and represented
that prove the death penalty is consistently unjust, and it’s precisely
this fundamental—and lethal—injustice, Dow argues, that should compel
us to abandon the system altogether.
|
 |
|
The
Celluloid Courtroom: A History of Legal Cinema by Ross D. Levi
Westport, Conn. : Praeger Publishers, 2005
PN1995.9.J8 L48 2005 Basement
The genre of legal cinema is an extensive and revealing one: it is
a body of films that depicts lawyers, clients, criminals, judges, and
juries, often not as they actually are, but as we would like them to
be. The idealized courtroom of many legal movies tells us a great deal
about what we think of our justice system and what we want it to
reflect about America, but the films in the genre vary widely in how
they do this. From To Kill a Mockingbird to Liar, Liar, from A Time to Kill to Twelve Angry Men,
we see certain stereotypes repeating themselves again and again: the
judge as stern referee, the jury as an ultimately fair body of
decisionmakers, the lawyer as hardworking and passionate fighter for
the underdog. In this new and comprehensive study of this understudied
category of film, author Ross D. Levi argues that, contrary to popular
belief, legal movies show us a system that is far more fair than our
actual one, with corruption downplayed and greed made subordinate to
compassion and compromise.
These are films that have
affected as much as reflected the American justice system, as we enter
the courts hoping, often against hope, that they will be something like
what we've seen in the movies. With a comprehensive filmography,
penetrating analysis--both legal and cinematic--and engaging and
enlightening discussion, The Celluloid Courtroom is an indispensable guide to a key aspect of American movies and American justice.
|
Contact
Information
Home
| Prospective
Students | Faculty
& Academics | Faculty,
Staff & Student Resources |
Alumni
& Giving
Law
Library |
Career Services
| Dean
Rusk Center & International Programs |
Visiting
Our Campus | News
Search
| Site
Index
The University
of Georgia School of Law
Athens, GA 30602
(706) 542-5191
Copyright
© 2005,
University of Georgia School of Law. All rights reserved.
|