|
Featured Acquisitions - February
2006

|
|
Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership by Martha C. Nussbaum
Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006
HM671 .N87 2006 Basement
Theories of social justice are necessarily abstract, reaching
beyond the particular and the immediate to the general and the
timeless. Yet such theories, addressing the world and its problems,
must respond to the real and changing dilemmas of the day. A brilliant
work of practical philosophy, Frontiers of Justice
is dedicated to this proposition. Taking up three urgent problems of
social justice neglected by current theories and thus harder to tackle
in practical terms and everyday life, Martha Nussbaum seeks a theory of
social justice that can guide us to a richer, more responsive approach
to social cooperation.
The idea of the social contract--especially as developed in
the work of John Rawls--is one of the most powerful approaches to
social justice in the Western tradition. But as Nussbaum demonstrates,
even Rawls's theory, suggesting a contract for mutual advantage among
approximate equals, cannot address questions of social justice posed by
unequal parties. How, for instance, can we extend the equal rights of
citizenship--education, health care, political rights and liberties--to
those with physical and mental disabilities? How can we extend justice
and dignified life conditions to all citizens of the world? And how,
finally, can we bring our treatment of nonhuman animals into our
notions of social justice? Exploring the limitations of the social
contract in these three areas, Nussbaum devises an alternative theory
based on the idea of "capabilities." She helps us to think more clearly
about the purposes of political cooperation and the nature of political
principles--and to look to a future of greater justice for all.
|
 |
|
The Secret Treaties of History
by Edward Grosek
[S.l.] : Xlibris Corp., c2004
KZ118 .G76 2004 Basement
The Secret Treaties of History is the first general index
for locating the texts of agreements that nations entered into
secretly. It lists and explains 593 secret treaties made from 1521 to
2000 among 110 nations and political entities. Each secret treaty entry
in the list has the treaty’s title, its contracting states, the city
and date of signature, a citation to at least one source of text and/or
credible information, and an annotation for its background or content.
Most of these treaties were concluded for political or military ends.
They are found among scores of treaty collections, in documentaries, in
government reports, in research reports based on scholarly work in
archives, in a small number of history books, and in articles in
learned journals and articles by investigative journalists. The entire
list, which makes up Chapter 1, is indexed by nation. It will be of
direct use to professors and students of history, political science,
and international law and, of course, to librarians and journalists.
Chapter 2 is a guide to the many sources of secret treaty texts cited
to in the first chapter. Chapter 3 is an annotated bibliography for the
study of secret diplomacy and secret agreement–making and for
statements (including denials) made by American leaders on secrecy in
diplomacy and treaty negotiations. Chapter 4 is an essay on the
characteristics of secret treaties themselves and their signers.
Chapter 5 explains the legal rules that the American President must
abide by when he makes confidential, unpublished treaties with other
world leaders. This chapter should interest foreign government
officials, legal theorists, and international lawyers. Chapter 6
consists of an introduction to the Treaty of Crépi of 1544, four pages
of photocopies of the original handwritten text of the secret articles
to this treaty, and an English language translation of them. Neither
the French nor the Spanish Ministries of Foreign Affairs have a copy of
this treaty’s secret articles, nor are they published in any other book
or journal article. This text and translation will be useful to a
historian or biographer who needs full information on Francis I of
France or Charles V of Spain.
|
 |
|
Psychology and Law: An Empirical Perspective edited by Neil Brewer and Kipling D. Williams
New York : Guilford Press, c2005
RA1148 .P78 2005 Basement
From the initial investigation of a crime to the sentencing of an
offender, a wide range of practices within the criminal justice system
draw on psychological knowledge. In this book, prominent cognitive and
social psychology researchers analyze the processes involved in such
tasks as interviewing witnesses, detecting deception, and eliciting
eyewitness reports and identification from adults and children. Also
analyzed are factors that influence decision making by jurors and
judges, including the persuasive strategies used by lawyers.
Throughout, findings from experimental research are translated into
clear recommendations for improving the quality of evidence and the
fairness of investigative and legal proceedings. The book also
addresses salient methodological questions and identifies key
directions for future investigation.
|
 |
|
The Destruction of Young Lawyers: Beyond One L
by Douglas Litowitz
Akron, Ohio : University of Akron Press, 2006
KF298 .L58 2006 Balcony
Young lawyers are morosely unhappy
by every conceivable standard. They arrive at our law schools brimming
with enthusiasm, but a decade later they are reporting staggering
levels of anxiety, drug addiction, and depression. In legal circles
there is talk about a “crisis of professionalism” and a “decline in
civility,” but the problem goes much deeper. Through ignorance and
greed, the legal profession has designed a complicated system of
education, licensing, and practice that drives young lawyers into fear,
alienation, and self-hatred. The author of this book—a law professor
and practicing attorney—argues that young lawyers face a series of
institutional absurdities built into the fabric of law school, the bar
exam, and law firm practice. The current system is churning out a tidal
wave of disaffected and bitter lawyers who see the legal system as a
Byzantine maze, an endless artificial game totally disconnected from
considerations of justice. The Destruction of Young Lawyers
shows how these struggles can be reversed through massive structural
change and is the first step toward diagnosis and treatment of the
specific problems facing young lawyers
|
 |
|
Math You Can't Use: Patents, Copyright, and Software by Ben Klemens
Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press, c2006
K1519.C6 K54 2006 Balcony
The field of software is awash in
disputes. Market participants and analysts routinely disagree on how
computer programs should be produced, marketed, regulated, and sold. On
one subject, however, just about everyone can agree: the current
intellectual property protection regime for software is a mess. At
present, all of the traditional means of delimiting intellectual
property—patents, copyrights, and trade secrets—are applied to software
in one manner or another. Congress has even invented a new type of law
for cases in which these may be insufficient, with the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act.
The result is widespread confusion,
along with the proliferation of nuisance suits. To date, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office has granted more than 170,000 software
patents, some on applications as commonplace as the pop-up window. Each
of these patents gives the holder the right to sue others where no such
right existed before, and so gaming of the system abounds. Software
providers are forced to funnel millions of dollars annually into
defending themselves against lawsuits rather than developing better
software. The wave of litigation may end up stifling innovation and
hobbling the open source movement, one of the most promising
developments of recent years.
How did the situation arise? And where should we go from here? In Math You Can’t Use,
Ben Klemens draws on his experience as both a programmer and an
economist to tackle these critical issues. The answer to the first
question, he explains, is simple: while patent laws are intended to
apply to physical machines, software is something quite different.
Software is not just another machine, and it is not Hamlet with
numbers. It is a functional hybrid that can be duplicated at no cost,
it is legible by computers in some forms and by humans in others, and
it has a unique mathematical structure. All of these facts have to be
taken into consideration in designing an appropriate intellectual
property regime.
Designing such a system is a more
difficult task. Klemens considers several alternatives, from modifying
the existing rules to eliminating software patents in favor of a
copyright-centered regime. Ultimately, he concludes, it is up to
Congress to determine how software should be protected.
|
 |
|
Law Without Justice: Why Criminal Law Doesn't Give People What They Deserve by Paul H. Robinson and Michael T. Cahill
Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2006
KF9223 .R62 2006 Balcony
If an innocent person is sent to prison or if a killer walks free, we
are outraged. The legal system assures us, and we expect and demand,
that it will seek to "do justice" in criminal cases. So why, for some
cases, does the criminal law deliberately and routinely sacrifice
justice? Why would criminal law rules be designed to give people punishment other than what they deserve?
In this unflinching look at American criminal law, Paul Robinson and
Michael Cahill demonstrate that cases with unjust outcomes are not
always irregular or unpredictable. Rather, the criminal law sometimes chooses not to give defendants what they deserve: that is, unsatisfying results occur even when the system works as it is designed to work.
Sometimes the law punishes more than is warranted, as in the case of
Leandro Andrade, who stole $154 worth of videotapes and yet under
California's three strikes law will spend at least fifty years in
prison. Other times a legal rule punishes less than is merited, as with
Sammy "the Bull" Gravano, a ruthless mob killer granted immunity for
numerous murders in return for informing on his fellow Mafiosi.
Law without Justice
comprehensively surveys the undeserved outcomes that occur because of
law, rather than in spite of it. From statutes of limitations and
double-jeopardy rules that disallow newly found evidence conclusively
proving an offender's guilt, to harsh doctrines that ignore legitimate
claims of blamelessness, the authors find that while some
justice-sacrificing doctrines serve their intended purpose, many others
do not, or could be replaced by other, better rules that would serve
the purpose without abandoning a just result.
With a panoramic view of the overlapping and often competing goals that
our legal institutions must balance on a daily basis, this book
challenges us to restore justice to the criminal justice system.
|
 |
|
Denial of Justice in International Law by Jan Paulsson
Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2005
K967 .P38 2005 Balcony
Denial of justice is one of the oldest bases of liability in
international law and the modern understanding of denial of justice is
examined by Paulsson in this book. The possibilities for prosecuting
the offence of denial of justice have evolved in fundamental ways and
it is now settled law that States cannot disavow international
responsibility by arguing that their courts are independent of the
government. Even more importantly, the doors of international tribunals
have swung wide open to admit claimants other than states:
non-governmental organisations, corporations, and individuals, and
Paulsson examines several recent cases of great importance in his book.
|
 |
|
High-Profile Crimes: When Legal Cases Become Social Causes by Lynn S. Chancer
Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2005
HV6789 .C397 2005 Basement O. J. Simpson. The Central Park jogger. Bensonhurst. William Kennedy
Smith. Rodney King. These are more than crimes and criminals, more than
court cases. They are cultural events that, for better or worse, gave
concrete expression to latent social conflicts in American society. In High-Profile Crimes,
Lynn Chancer explores how these cases became conflated with larger
social causes on a collective level and how this phenomenon has
affected the law, the media, and social movements.
An astute and incisive chronicle of some of the most polarizing cases of the 1980s and 1990s, High-Profile Crimes
shows that their landmark status results from the overlapping
interaction of diverse participants. The merging of legal cases and
social causes, Chancer argues, has wrought ambivalent effects on both
social movements and the law. On the one hand, high-profile crimes
offer important opportunities for emotional expression and raise
awareness of social issues. But on the other hand, social problems
cannot be resolved through the either/or determinations that are the
goals of the legal system, creating frustration for those who look to
the outcome of these cases for social progress. Guilt or innocence
through the lens of the media leads to either defeat or victory for a
social cause-a confounding situation that made the O. J. Simpson case,
for example, unable to resolve the issues of domestic violence and
police racism that it had come to symbolize.
Based on nearly two
hundred interviews, Chancer's discussions of the infamous Central Park
jogger and Bensonhurst cases-as well as the rape trials of William
Kennedy Smith and Mike Tyson, the assault cases of Rodney King and
Reginald Denny, and, finally, the O. J. Simpson murder trial-provide a
convincing, multidimensional and innovative analysis of the most
charged public dramas of the last two decades. |
 |
|
On the History of the Idea of Law by Shirley Robin Letwin Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2005
K215.E53 L48 2005 Balcony
On the History of the Idea of Law is the first book ever to trace
the development of the philosophical theory of law from its first
appearance in Plato’s writings to today. Professor Letwin finds
important and positive insights and tensions in the theories of Plato,
Aristotle, Augustine, and Hobbes. She finds confusions and serious
errors introduced by Cicero, Aquinas, Bentham, and Marx. She harnesses
the insights of H. L. A. Hart and especially Michael Oakeshott to mount
a devastating attack on the late twentieth-century theories of Ronald
Dworkin, the Critical Legal Studies movement, and feminist
jurisprudence. In all of this, Professor Letwin finds the rule of law
to be the key to modern liberty and the standard of justice. This is
the final work of the distinguished historian and theorist Shirley
Robin Letwin, a major figure in the revival of Conservatine thought and
doctrine from 1960 onwards, who died in 1993.
|
 |
|
Just Silences: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law by Marianne Constable
Princeton : Princeton University Press, c2005
K579.I6 C66 2005 Balcony
Is the Miranda warning, which lets an accused know of the right to
remain silent, more about procedural fairness or about the conventions
of speech acts and silences? Do U.S. laws about Native Americans
violate the preferred or traditional "silence" of the peoples whose
religions and languages they aim to "protect" and "preserve"? In Just Silences, Marianne Constable draws on such examples to explore what is at stake in modern law: a potentially new silence as to justice.
Grounding
her claims about modern law in rhetorical analyses of U.S. law and
legal texts and locating those claims within the tradition of
Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Foucault, Constable asks what we are to make
of silences in modern law and justice. She shows how what she calls
"sociolegal positivism" is more important than the natural law/positive
law distinction for understanding modern law. Modern law is a social
and sociological phenomenon, whose instrumental, power-oriented,
sometimes violent nature raises serious doubts about the continued
possibility of justice. She shows how particular views of language and
speech are implicated in such law.
But law--like language--has
not always been positivist, empirical, or sociological, nor need it be.
Constable examines possibilities of silence and proposes an alternative
understanding of law--one that emerges in the calling, however
silently, of words to justice. Profoundly insightful and fluently
written, Just Silences suggests that justice today lies precariously in the silences of modern positive law.
|
 |
|
Wilkie Collins's The Dead Alive : the Novel, the Case, and Wrongful Convictions by Rob Warden
Evanston, Ill. : Northwestern University Press, c2005
PR4494 .D427 2005 Basement
On the evidence of The Dead Alive, Scott Turow writes in
his foreword that Wilkie Collins might well be the first author of a
legal thriller. Here is the lawyer out of sorts with his profession;
the legal process gone awry; even a touch of romance to soften the
rigors of the law. And here, too, recast as fiction, is the United
States' first documented wrongful conviction case. Side by side with
the novel, this book presents the real-life legal thriller Collins used
as his model--the story of two brothers, Jesse and Stephen Boorn,
sentenced to death in Vermont in 1819 for the murder of their
brother-in-law, and belatedly exonerated when their "victim" showed up
alive and well in New Jersey in 1820.
Rob Warden, one of the nation's most eloquent and effective
advocates for the wrongly convicted, reconsiders the facts of the Boorn
case for what they can tell us about the systemic flaws that produced
this first known miscarriage of justice--flaws that continue to riddle
our system of justice today. A tale of false confessions and jailhouse
snitches, of evidence overlooked, and justice more blinkered than
blind, the Boorns' story reminds us of the perennial nature of the
errors at the heart of American jurisprudence-and of the need to
question and correct a system that regularly condemns the innocent.
|
 |
|
Marriage Proposals: Questioning a Legal Status edited by Anita Bernstein
New York : New York University Press, c2006
KF510 .M37 2006 Balcony
The essays in Marriage Proposals envision a variety of
scenarios in which adults would continue to join themselves together
seeking permanent companionship and sustenance, linking sexual intimacy
to a long commitment, usually caring for each other, and building new
families. What would disappear are the legal consequences associated
with marriage. No joint income tax return; no immigration privileges
like the "fiancée visa" or the right to bring in a husband or wife; no
special statuses for prison visits or hospital decisions; no
prerogative to remain silent in court by claiming "confidential marital
communications"; no pension entitlements; no marital benefits and
detriments regarding criminal or civil liability.
The anthology
makes a unique contribution amid the two marriage furors of the day:
same-sex marriage and the Bush Administration's "marriage movement"
(that marrying is good and more marriages would be better for society).
Abolishing the legal category of marriage is the only policy suggestion
in current American discourse that speaks to both causes. Activists on
both sides of the same-sex marriage fight, along with marriage movement
partisans, all seek improvement through law reform. Marriage Proposals gives them a viable reform—abolition of marriage as a legal status—for fighting battles in the courtroom and the streets.
|
 |
|
Winning Legally: How To Use the Law to Create Value, Marshal Resources, and Manage Risk by Constance E. Bagley
Boston : Harvard Business School Press, c2005
KF390.B84 B347 2005 Balcony
The rash of corporate scandals in recent years underscores a fact too
often ignored in the business world: flouting the law holds serious
consequences. Indeed, all it takes is one rogue trader, one greedy
executive, or one misinformed manager to place an entire organization
at risk. But respected legal expert Constance E. Bagley argues that
staying out of trouble is only part of the picture when it comes to
legality in business. In Winning Legally, Bagley shows how managers can
proactively harness the power of the law to maximize corporate value,
marshal human and financial resources, and manage risk. Through scores
of classic and contemporary examples across the business landscape,
this no-nonsense guide completely reframes the relationship of law to
business. Bagley explains how managers can use the law as a strategic
tool to help select and work effectively with legal advisers, spot
legal issues before they become problems, weigh the legal risks of
specific opportunities, and more. Ultimately, the responsibility for
making tough business decisions lies with managers--not with lawyers.
This timely book shows how managers can combine business audacity and
vision with integrity and respect for the law to build truly great and
enduring firms
|
 |
|
In the Name of Necessity: Military Tribunals and the Loss of American Civil Liberties
by Marouf Hasian Jr.
Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press, c2005
KF7625 .H37 2005 Balcony
Though the war on terrorism is said to have generated
unprecedented military situations, arguments for the Patriot Act and
military tribunals following 9/11 resemble many historical claims for
restricting civil liberties, more often than not in the name of
necessity.
Marouf Hasian Jr. examines the major legal cases
that show how various generations have represented the need for
military tribunals, and how officials historically have applied the
term "necessity." George Washington cited the necessity of martial
discipline in executing the British operative Major Andre. Tribunals
tried and convicted more than 200 Sioux warriors during the Dakota
Wars. President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus for many civilian and
military prisoners during the Civil War. Twentieth Century military and
civilian leaders selectively drafted their own codes, leading to the
execution of German saboteurs during World War II. Further, General
MacArthurメs tribunal to investigate the wartime activities of Japanese
General Yamashita raised the specter of "victor's justice,"
anticipating the outcry that attended the Nuremberg trials.
In those cases as in current debates about the
prosecution of terrorists, Hasian argues that the past is often cited
selectively, neglecting historical contexts and the controversies these
cases engendered.
|
Contact
Information
Home
| Prospective
Students | Faculty
& Academics | Faculty,
Staff & Student Resources |
Alumni
& Giving
Law
Library |
Career Services
| Dean
Rusk Center & International Programs |
Visiting
Our Campus | News
Search
| Site
Index
The University
of Georgia School of Law
Athens, GA 30602
(706) 542-5191
Copyright © 2006,
University of Georgia School of Law. All rights reserved.
|