|
Featured Acquisitions - March
2005

|
|
Shakedown:
How Corporations, Government, and Trial Lawyers Abuse
the Judicial Process by Robert A. Levy
Washington, D.C. : Cato Institute, c2004
KF1250 .L48 2004
Balcony
Baseless
lawsuits encourage the notion that individuals can engage
in risky behavior, then force someone else to pay for their
mistakes. That’s the premise underlying litigation against
manufacturers of cigarettes, guns, lead paint, fatty foods,
and alcoholic beverages.
Meanwhile, our antitrust laws have been co-opted by frustrated
competitors who curry favor with bureaucrats to attack market
leaders such as Microsoft. In effect, antitrust is now a subsidy
used to promote the parochial interests of politically favored
companies.
In Shakedown, Robert
A. Levy uncovers the worst abuses of a judicial system
run amok, then offers concrete proposals to fix the problems.
Here are some of the author’s hard-hitting criticisms:
- Tobacco.
Today, the cigarette companies; tomorrow, anyone could
be victimized. The rule of law has yielded to ambitious
state attorneys general, social engineers, and contingency-fee
trial lawyers stalking an outcast industry.
- Guns.
To circumvent the legislature, anti-gun advocates have
taken their battle to the courtroom. The courts must not
entertain lawsuits based on bizarre legal theories that
seek to have every “victim” compensated by
corporate America.
- Tort
Reform. Many companies believe that no matter how responsibly
they behave, they’ll be held liable for the negligence
of others. That problem is real, but tort law is up to
the states, not Congress.
- Antitrust.
The concept of antitrust is flawed to the core. Markets
move faster than antitrust ever could. Consumers can unseat
any product and any company no matter how powerful. Antitrust,
if it ever was needed, is now obsolete.
Shakedown
is a sweeping indictment of abusive lawsuits in the United
States and a blueprint for overhauling our antitrust and tort
laws.
|
 |
|
Global
Justice Reform: A Comparative Methodology
by Hiram E. Chodosh
New York : New York University Press, c2005
K2100 .C56 2004
Balcony
Global
Justice Reform provides a trenchant critique and creative
conceptual reconstruction of two neglected subjects: the
nature of comparison in the field of comparative law and
the struggles of national judicial systems to meet global
rule of law objectives. Hiram Chodosh offers a candid look
at the surprisingly underdeveloped methodology of comparative
legal studies, and provides a creative conceptual framework
for defining and understanding the whys, whats, and hows
of comparison. Additionally, Chodosh demonstrates how theories
of comparative law translate into practice, using contemporary
global justice reform initiatives as a case study, with
a particular focus on Indonesia and India. Chodosh highlights
the gap between the critical role of judicial institutions
and their poor performance (for example, political interference,
corruption, backlog, and delay), discussing why reform is
so elusive and demonstrating the unavoidable and essential
role of comparison in reform proposals.
Throughout
the book, Chodosh identifies several sources of comparative
misunderstanding that impede successful reforms, and identifies
the many predicaments reformers face, detailing a wide variety
of designs, methods, and social dilemmas. In response to
these seemingly insurmountable challenges, Chodosh advances
some novel conceptual strategies, first by drawing on a
body of non-legal scholarship on self-regulating, emergent
systems, and then by identifying a series of anti-dilemma
strategies that draw upon insights about the nature of comparison.
|
 |
|
Alienated:
Immigrant Rights, the Constitution, and Equality in
America by Victor C. Romero
New York : New York University Press, c2005
KF4819 .R66 2005
Balcony Throughout
American history, the government has used U.S. citizenship
and immigration law to protect privileged groups from less
privileged ones, using citizenship as a "legitimate" proxy
for otherwise invidious, and often unconstitutional, discrimination
on the basis of race. While racial discrimination is rarely
legally acceptable today, profiling on the basis of citizenship
is still largely unchecked, and has in fact arguably increased
in the wake of the September 11 terror attacks on the United
States. In this thoughtful examination of the intersection
between American immigration and constitutional law, Victor
C. Romero draws our attention to a "constitutional immigration
law paradox" that reserves certain rights for U.S. citizens
only, while simultaneously purporting to treat all people
fairly under constitutional law regardless of citizenship.
As a
naturalized Filipino American, Romero brings an outsider's
perspective to Alienated, forcing us to look at constitutional
immigration law from the vantage point of people whose citizenship
status is murky (either legally or from the viewpoint of
other citizens and lawmakers), including foreign-born adoptees,
undocumented immigrants, tourists, foreign students, and
same-gender bi-national partners. Romero endorses an equality-based
reading of the Constitution and advocates a new theoretical
and practical approach that protects the individual rights
of non-citizens without sacrificing their personhood.
|
 |
|
A
Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of
Constitutional Law by Mark Tushnet
New
York : W.W. Norton Co., c2005
KF8742 .T87 2005
Balcony
Many think
that the Rehnquist Court's most important division is between
its liberals and its conservatives, when in reality the division
lies between two types of Republican conservatives. Some—Rehnquist,
Scalia, and Thomas—are in tune with the modern post-Reagan
Republican Party, while Kennedy and O'Connor, considered to
be in the Court's center, represent an older Republican tradition.
As a result, the Court has modestly promoted the economic
agenda of today's conservatives but has regularly defeated
the conservatives' agenda of social issues.
One of America's finest professors of constitutional law,
Mark Tushnet narrates the dramas of the Court—both intellectual
and personal—with clarity and flair. In this authoritative
analysis of the most important cases decided by the Rehnquist
Court, he reveals how the decisions of these divided justices
have left the future of the Court—and the nation—hanging
in the balance with all depending on the next court appointments
after the elections in November 2004.
|
 |
|
The
Second Tree: Stem Cells, Clones, Chimeras, and Quests
for Immortality by Elaine Dewar
New
York : Carroll & Graf, 2004
QH442 .D49 2004 Basement
In
the half century since Watson and Crick's discovery of the
double helix, genetic scientists have grafted onto the tree
of knowledge a body of new science whose growth - upward and
outward - has slipped the bonds of nature and the divine.
Investigative journalist Elaine Dewar chronicles the lives,
the discoveries, and the feuds among these modern biologists,
exploring how they have crafted the tools to alter human evolution,
with unforeseeable, promising, and frightening consequences
the rest of us are just beginning to glimpse.
|
 |
|
Selling
Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Workers' Rights
at Wal-Mart by Liza Featherstone
New
York : Basic Books, 2004
HD6060.5.U5 F43 2004 Basement
On
television, Wal-Mart employees are smiling women delighted
with their jobs. But reality is another story. In 2000,
Betty Dukes, a 52-year-old black woman in Pittsburg, California,
became the lead plaintiff in Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores,
a class action representing 1.4 million women. In an explosive
investigation of this historic lawsuit, journalist Liza
Featherstone reveals how Wal-Mart, a self-styled "family-oriented,"
Christian company:
- Deprives
women (but not men) of the training they need to advance
- Relegates
women to lower-paying jobs, like selling baby clothes,
reserving the more lucrative positions for men
- Inflicts
punitive demotions on employees who object to discrimination
- Exploits
Asian women in its sweatshops in Saipan, a U.S. commonwealth
Featherstone
reveals the creative solutions Wal-Mart workers around the
country have found-like fighting for unions, living-wage ordinances,
and childcare options. Selling Women Short combines
the personal stories of these employees with superb investigative
journalism to show why women who work low-wage jobs are getting
a raw deal, and what they are doing about it.
|
 |
|
The
Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of
Human Rights by Naomi Roht-Arriaza
Philadelphia
: University of Pennsylvania Press, c2005
KH966.I57 R64 2005 Sohn Library
The
1998 arrest of General Augusto Pinochet in London and subsequent
extradition proceedings sent an electrifying wave through
the international community. This legal precedent for bringing
a former head of state to trial outside his home country
signaled that neither the immunity of a former head of state
nor legal amnesties at home could shield participants in
the crimes of military governments. It also allowed victims
of torture and crimes against humanity to hope that their
tormentors might be brought to justice. In this meticulously
researched volume, Naomi Roht-Arriaza examines the implications
of the litigation against members of the Chilean and Argentine
military governments and traces their effects through similar
cases in Latin American and Europe.
Roht-Arriaza
discusses the difficulties in bringing violators of human
rights to justice at home, and considers the role of transitional
justice in transnational prosecutions and investigations
in the national courts of countries other than those where
the crimes took place. She traces the roots of the landmark
Pinochet case and follows its development and those of related
cases, through Spain, the United Kingdom, elsewhere in Europe,
and then through Chile, Argentina, Mexico, and the United
States. She situates these transnational cases within the
context of an emergent International Criminal Court, as
well as the effectiveness of international law and of the
lawyers, judges, and activists working together across continents
to make a new legal paradigm a reality. Interviews and observations
help to contextualize and dramatize these compelling cases.
These
cases have tremendous ramifications for the prospect of
universal jurisdiction and will continue to resonate for
years to come. Roht-Arriaza's deft navigation of these complicated
legal proceedings elucidates the paradigm shift underlying
this prosecution as well as the traction gained by advocacy
networks promoting universal jurisdiction in recent decades.
|
 |
|
The
Limits of International Law by Jack L. Goldsmith and Eric
A. Posner
Oxford
; New York : Oxford University Press, 2005
KZ3160.P67 A38 2005 Basement
International
law is much debated and discussed, but poorly understood.
Does international law matter, or do states regularly violate
it with impunity? If international law is of no importance,
then why do states devote so much energy to negotiating treaties
and providing legal defenses for their actions? In turn, if
international law does matter, why does it reflect the interests
of powerful states, why does it change so often, and why are
violations of international law usually not punished?
In this book,
Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner argue that international law
matters but that it is less powerful and less significant
than public officials, legal experts, and the media believe.
International law, they contend, is simply a product of states
pursuing their interests on the international stage. It does
not pull states towards compliance contrary to their interests,
and the possibilities for what it can achieve are limited.
It follows that many global problems are simply unsolvable.
The book
has important implications for debates about the role of international
law in the foreign policy of the United States and other nations.
The authors see international law as an instrument for advancing
national policy, but one that is precarious and delicate,
constantly changing in unpredictable ways based on non-legal
changes in international politics. They believe that efforts
to replace international politics with international law rest
on unjustified about optimism international law's past accomplishments
and present capacities.
|
 |
|
Brand
Name Bullies: The Quest to Own and Control Culture
by David Bollier
Hoboken,
N.J. : J. Wiley, c2005
KF2979 .B64 2005
Balcony
An impassioned,
darkly amusing look at how corporations misuse copyright law
to stifle creativity and free speech
If you want to make fun of Mickey or Barbie on your Web site,
you may be hearing from some corporate lawyers. You should
also think twice about calling something "fair and balanced"
or publicly using Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream"
speech. It may be illegal. Or it may be entirely legal, but
the distinction doesn't matter if you can't afford a lawyer.
More and more, corporations are grabbing and asserting rights
over every idea and creation in our world, regardless of the
law's intent or the public interest. But beyond the humorous
absurdity of all this, there lies a darker problem, as David
Bollier shows in this important new book. Lawsuits and legal
bullying clearly prevent the creation of legitimate new software,
new art and music, new literature, new businesses, and worst
of all, new scientific and medical research.
|
 |
|
Compliance
with Decisions of the International Court of Justice
by Constanze Shulte
Oxford
; New York : Oxford University Press, 2004
KZ6275 .S38 2004 Basement
This
book examines the compliance record of states parties to proceedings
before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal
judicial body of the United Nations. It undertakes a comprehensive
analysis of the follow-up of the ICJ's judgments and interim
measures from the Court's creation in 1945 until the present
day. ICJ judgments and provisional measures from the Corfu
Channel case in the late 1940s to the Arrest Warrant Case
decided in 2002 are examined, with particular focus on state
practice.
After explaining
the legal bases for the obligation of compliance and the enforcement
of ICJ decisions, the author analyses all decisions that gave
rise to an obligation of compliance. The analysis is contextual,
taking into account the history of the dispute, the underlying
political interests, the parties' attitudes towards involvement
of the ICJ, and the substance of the applicable law.
This analysis
reveals that the compliance record for judgments is generally
satisfactory, whereas that for provisional measures is at
first sight rather poor. Yet the record for provisional measures
must be understood in a more nuanced light. In several cases,
the applicant gained at least a certain benefit from the decision
even though it was not (or was not fully) implemented. The
author examines the reasons for the difference in the track
records of judgments and provisional measures and explores
mechanisms that could be conducive to enhanced compliance.
|
 |
|
The
Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom: A Legal History
by Alexander Tsesis
New
York : New York University Press, c2004
KF4545.S5 T74 2004 Balcony
In this narrative
history and contextual analysis of the Thirteenth Amendment,
slavery and freedom take center stage. Alexander Tsesis demonstrates
how entrenched slavery was in pre-Civil War America, how central
it was to the political events that resulted in the Civil
War, and how it was the driving force that led to the adoption
of an amendment that ultimately provided a substantive assurance
of freedom for all American citizens. The story of how Supreme
Court justices have interpreted the Thirteenth Amendment,
first through racist lenses after Reconstruction and later
influenced by the modern civil rights movement, provides insight
into the tremendous impact the Thirteenth Amendment has had
on the Constitution and American culture. Importantly, Tsesis
also explains why the Thirteenth Amendment is essential to
contemporary America, offering fresh analysis on the role
the Amendment has played regarding civil rights legislation
and personal liberty case decisions, and an original explanation
of the substantive guarantees of freedom for today's society
that the Reconstruction Congress envisioned over a century
ago. |
 |
|
Marriage
in Medieval England: Law, Literature and Practice
by Conor McCarthy1
Woodbridge,
Suffolk ; Rochester, NY : Boydell Press, 2004
HQ615 .M38 2004 Basement
Medieval
marriage has been widely discussed, and this book gives a
brief and accessible overview of an important subject. It
covers the entire medieval period, and engages with a wide
range of primary sources, both legal and literary. It draws
particular attention to local English legislation and practice,
and offers some new readings of medieval English literary
texts, including Beowulf, the works of Chaucer, Langland's
Piers Plowman, the Book of Margery Kempe and the Paston Letters.
Focusing on a number of key themes important across the period,
individual chapters discuss the themes of consent, property,
alliance, love, sex, family, divorce and widowhood. |
Contact
Information
Home
| Prospective
Students | Faculty
& Academics | Faculty,
Staff & Student Resources |
Alumni
& Giving
Law
Library |
Career Services
| Dean
Rusk Center & International Programs |
Visiting
Our Campus | News
Search
| Site
Index
The University
of Georgia School of Law
Athens, GA 30602
(706) 542-5191
Copyright
© 2005,
University of Georgia School of Law. All rights reserved.
|