The 22nd Annual Symposium on Legal Ethics and Professionalism

University of Georgia School of Law
Virtual Symposium
February 25, 2022

Lawyering For the President:
Testing the Limits of Ethics and Professionalism

Lawyers have always played prominent roles in presidential administrations. Depending upon their positions and proximity to the chief executive, lawyers fulfill functions that range from traditional courtroom-related advocacy, to providing legal advice, to serving as public spokespersons. These lawyers can be political appointees, nonpolitical civil servants, or private attorneys retained to represent more personal presidential interests. Whatever their position or role, such lawyers are subject to the same ethics rules and professionalism ideals that guide all members of the bar. However, the ethical issues they encounter are often uniquely complex and the stakes extraordinarily high.

Fundamental ethical questions abound in lawyering for the President—Who is the client? How far is too far in terms of advocating a legal position? When, if ever, is it appropriate to follow directives from the President? What is the proper balance between privileged communications and the public’s right to know? This Symposium will examine how lawyers—public and private—dealt (or should have dealt) with these and other difficult questions in relation to various administrations. Particular attention will be given to certain lawyering actions taken during the Trump administration, including: (1) defending against allegations of presidential wrongdoing; (2) pursuing post-election litigation on the President’s behalf; and (3) responding to requests or directives from the President on legal matters. The complicated ethical challenges presented by these examples are representative of those that lawyers have faced in previous administrations and will undoubtedly continue to encounter in lawyering for the President.

Registration

Registration required to receive the link for the symposium, which will be sent prior to the event. 

Free for community members and University of Georgia students, faculty and staff.

For attorneys seeking Georgia Continuing Legal Education Credits (6 credits, including 1 Ethics Hour, 1Trial Hour and 1 Professionalism Hour), the cost is $24.

Written Materials

Register for Webinar Here

Schedule

9:00 – 9:15

Welcome/Introductory Remarks

Lonnie T. Brown, Jr.
Cleveland Distinguished Chair of Legal Ethics and Professionalism &
Josiah Meigs Distinguished Teaching Professor, UGA School of Law

9:15 – 10:45

Panel Discussion

Lawyering in the Courtroom: Drawing the Ethical Line Between Zealous and Frivolous Advocacy

In lawyering for the President, lawyers may sometimes feel compelled to advocate positions that appear lacking in legal or factual merit. This can stem from political pressure, strategic maneuvering, or a profound belief that real harm has occurred or must be averted. Whatever the explanation, the question that must be answered is: Does such advocacy cross the ethical line? Also, relatedly, should the fact that one is lawyering for the President warrant special consideration?

Moderator

Lonnie T. Brown, Jr.
 
Panelists
 
Josh Belinfante
Partner, Robbins Firm, Atlanta, GA

Rebecca Roiphe
Trustee Professor of Law and Co-Dean for Faculty Scholarship, New York Law School
 
Michael B. Terry
Partner, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore LLP, Atlanta, GA
 
The Honorable Thomas W. Thrash
Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

10:45 – 11:00

Break

11:00 – 12:00

Keynote Address

Political Independence of Government Lawyers in the Executive Branch

Richard W. Painter
S. Walter Richey Professor of Corporate Law, University of Minnesota Law School

12:00 – 1:15

Lunch Break

1:15 – 2:45

Panel Discussion

Lawyering in the Public Domain: The Ethics of Advocating in the Court of Public Opinion

Lawyers for the President, at times, choose to advocate directly to the public rather than to a court. This type of advocacy occurred in connection with the post-2020 election lawsuits alleging voter fraud. Although various courts found evidence of such alleged fraud to be lacking, some lawyers for the President persisted in advocating their fraud-related contentions to the court of public opinion. When arguments devoid of legal or factual merit are made to a court, lawyers expose themselves to sanctions and possible professional discipline. Should there be similar consequences when lawyers advocate in the same manner outside the courtroom, or are they free to exercise their First Amendment rights as broadly as any other citizen? Should the fact that the advocacy is on behalf of the President make a difference?

Moderator

Logan E. Sawyer III
J. Alton Hosch Professor of Law & Director of Undergraduate Studies, UGA School of Law
 
Panelists
 
Patrick Longan
William Augustus Bootle Chair in Professionalism and Ethics, Mercer University School of Law
 
Margaret C. Tarkington
Professor of Law and Dean’s Fellow, Indiana University
Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Sonja R. West
Otis Brumby Distinguished Professor in First Amendment Law, UGA School of Law

W. Bradley Wendel
Edward H. Woodruff Professor of Law, Cornell Law School

2:45 – 3:00

Break

3:00 – 4:30

Panel Discussion

Lawyering in Private: Privilege and Confidentiality – Sacred Protection or Overused Cloak of Secrecy?

Those who lawyer for the President must often engage in communications that the chief executive would rather not be made public. Given the various roles and positions of such lawyers, it can be difficult to pinpoint when such communications are legitimately protected by the attorney-client privilege or another type of confidentiality shield. When are privilege assertions warranted and when do they exceed the legitimate scope of the protection? Should communications with the President be entitled to greater protection? And to what extent should unique concerns, such as national security, come into play?

Moderator

Ellen Murphy
Professor of Practice, Wake Forest University School of Law
 
Panelists
 
Kathleen Clark
Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
 
Bruce Green
Louis Stein Chair of Law & Director of the Stein Center, Fordham University School of Law

Larry D. Thompson
John A. Sibley Professor in Corporate and Business Law, UGA School of Law

Joe D. Whitley
Partner, Womble Bond Dickinson, Atlanta, GA and Washington, D.C.

4:30

Adjourn


 

The Georgia symposia on professionalism and ethics are made possible by the Honorable Hugh Lawson, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia. In 1999, Lawson oversaw the settlement of a matter that involved allegations of litigation misconduct and, as part of the settlement, four of Georgia's law schools each received an endowment to fund annual symposia dedicated to ethics and professionalism. The symposium series began in 2001, and it rotates among the University of Georgia, Emory University, Georgia State University and Mercer University. The topics addressed by the symposia are determined by professors charged with organizing the events.